All, I've responded to PALE on her thread. I'm of the view that pretty much everything that needs to be said has been said often enough for there to be little point in continuing to restate this stuff.

If I understood a post made under the PALE name the organisation has consider suggestions made by TurnRightThenLeft but chosen to accept the risks associated with private views being posted under their name without disclaimer or identification of who's views are represented. http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=1022#18079

I've said that if PALE stops attacks against me I'd prefer to leave the matter be at this point. I can in good faith repond to posts under PALES name knowing that I've taken reasonable steps to try and avoid the situation where their animal welfare work is harmed by the use of that name.

PALE, if it's the post I'm thinking of the opening post is http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=863#14814

R0bert

Just in that post the one two places above my concerns about pale are highlighted by pale.
See my mention of the name Kath Evans? see pale turn it in uncontrolled rage into Kath Young?
Understand in a post above that IT WAS PALE who first used the name of an official of that union?
Is it not clear my meeting on Friday ,the one Kath the little warrior of her union gave us information that clearly clashed with pales was the reason I repeated it.
I take no pleasure in the thread, hunt in the reply thread for my idea to resolve this issue.
It was wasted time pales has not changed one thing that started this thread and the other.
EACH POST PROVES THE CONCERNS IN POST ONE HERE REMAIN A CONCERN.
Eccentricity is not the problem.
Failure to understand others have views is a symptom not the problem.
School yard bullying and threats to tell teacher are another symptom.
It is true that no good can come from this thread ,no good will exists on the pale side of the debate.
I have thought long on this maybe the thread and its answer should be deleted, just maybe we should all stop answering the rudeness ,but nothing will be resolved by those actions.
I will not again answer pale ever but will return to defend myself
RObert our views are indeed different but you are right rudeness is not my habit.
Pales conduct is of concern, ongoing insults unneeded unprovoked and concerning.
Good must never leave the battle field to such as pale, pale here is attempting to stop free speech and ideas other than that groups, the tools include constant threats to tell site owners and constant entrenched rudeness.
Refusal to see the truth and much more.

Robert

What insults Show Us?

Robert said
"If I see you dealing with others using consistent courtesy and copping abuse in response I'll happily stick my two cents worth in.'
Robert0-What about Morgans.? Not one word from you!

Palerelpies
Show ‘one example’ we abused somebody that was NOT in response to a personal attacks.

Pale responded to “absolute insults’, normally with humour ?yet" `you` never said `one word.`

Actually you`v encouraged him.

Belly said-
can we take the group known as pale on face value?
your age and lack of education, or just the view of a very bitter old lady? Miss spell posts are always worth a read.
Is it pale the group [all 3 of you] or this poster who is so out of touch with Australia?
Posted by Belly, Saturday, 8 September 2007 6:15:59 PM
I AM A PAID TRADE UNION OFFICIAL.

This is the’ second time” you opened these threads about ‘which name” we post under.
Who are you?
Are your motives political?

You refused to use use their REAL names.

You threated to leave! WE put our names and pictures up. Huge difference in being honest and open.

We obey Graham Young – not anybody else.

Please give him some peace.

Not trying to offend. “Please see it through our eyes.”

That thread was put up by ‘you’ to discuss how pale is lodged with OLO. NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS!

After your first car park one person landed in hospital. Lawyers and so forth.

WE are NOT holding you responsibly for others actions.

We ARE questioning "if these car parks actually work?

It seems to me they promote more trouble.

I am also concerned at what effect it has on OLO itself.

OLO it `supposed to be a political forum.`

WE `honestly feel` it’s lowering the standard.

Robert you can’t run others lives.


PALE`S happy for it to continue other than being concerned for Graham’s business.

Considering the `SILENCE` by other groups before an election-

Even Pales posts of humour in response to `personal attacks` keeps

the CRUELTY Of LIVE EXPORTS in the 'publics eye`~.

What on earth did all that mean in English?

We humans are weak, we even ask ourselves why but if in a city street a person who we know has mental flaws comes it sight we look the other way.
A short Gday would do us no harm but we look the other way.
Just sometimes a keeper comes along takes the person in hand and says sorry.
At such time we say a quite good day and walk on by, now is that time.
Without a keeper appearing we will gain nothing.

Belly...Well said.