My comment was not one about the host posting as pale your continuing threats surely are beneath contempt?
I have set myself a task, one I often asked others ,some should do it and understand this thread before comment.
I found the first car park.
I am reading it, I was here for it but did not notice it, I was totally committed to debating the then new workchoices, but I should have looked in.
I find it did much good , some true debate and great Ideas, Grahams in put helped.
But the deleted posts? behavior has got much better hasn't it?
Once more that bloke on the other side of the fence than me RObert must be thanked.
That thread[half read but going back] was great.
Its intent was a better forum, it worked.
Now Graham I must ask, sorry it would be better left but good men do not gain by being too good, how long will we face these brutal threats rather than debate?
Just reading all the current front page threads on the forum , all of one posters comments, seeing the changes in personality if nothing else in those posts.
I have no wish to taunt pale, no wish to talk to them.
No Axe to grind, nothing, but I want to be left to post without treats.
I am after all a rough nut. but why
why is free speech so threatened? constant intrusions into other threads like is there a God to inform every one to watch me I may make a union God?
Or the slings and insults about Rudd vs Gillard in an unrelated thread?
Now let me explain that comment.
Ginx came in to say SPANKYS comments broke them up, people with little understanding of the history and the debate did so often.
To kick the door in on a thread you do not understand comment and run away only proves you could benefit by understanding the issues first.

belly Belly Belly
Nobody is threating you. Just the opposite in fact. You should thank Graham if he deleted something that is legally able to cause a problem.
He shows us no favours I can assure you.
Nobody is trying to change your personality either.

Just that you must understand this is a political forum and you should not take it so personally if others make political comments.

We actually just congradulated Mr Rudd on his medi care flip against Julia.

It was the right thing to do.
Just a suggestion but why dont you post in the area of you job and we "promise' we WONT go into that thread.

Everybody is good at something belly live exports just insn`t your strong point.

Why not post about your ideas but in the area you work because otherwise you are going to get offended all the time if any poster bags alp.

Because we are not selfish we are going to share the joke with other readers why your so endeared to us.
You wont like it but you crack us up.
Do you remember screaming and to another poster saying- What has the ALP China thread to do with these people. Surley they are following me around just to annoy me- [ or words to that effect.?

] We then explained that live exports to China are very much on topic for us.

I see now you have posted on another thread. My name is @@ and Iam a @@@ and I know a thing or two about exports.

Your priceless. love it!

Pale I grow weary can we agree not to refer to one another?
It is my view your self assurance is miss placed .
Your idea of humor is not one I share.
My concerns spoken to Graham here are regretted, in Truth no doubt about it only pale can change anything and that will not happen.

"belly
I am going to give you some advise because this thread is being viewed by other than olo staff.
The comment you posted below cant say legally. I dont think you realise what is legally defamotary.
We dont want you mixed up in any trouble." (Quote: PALEaIF)

RUBBISH!! ABSOLUTE RUBBISH!

This is a straight out threat to a poster.

Dammit all! You cannot even spell DEFAMATORY!

You hint strongly that lawyers are looking at this. They should be struck off IF that is the case!

There is NO defamatory remark here. What you are trying to do is to intimidate.

Belly (and R0bert?) for Crissake! LET IT GO. This barely lucid group of eejits will just continue ON and ON.

I have always promoted low level moderation on any forums. OLO has that. BUT: this thread should be locked. This kind of exchange is a bloody insult to the calibre of OLO.

PALaIF; your organisation under your/me/us/I guardianship, is dead and buried as far as I'm concerned.
I don't recall a group, club, OR organisation ANYWHERE that has behaved in the manner in which your sorry little gang have.

Strewth! You would have a Saint cursing.

Ginx every word you say is true, why do I come back? if only I knew!
Revisiting the first car park, well worth while it truly is.

belly
There were are never has been any suggestion of threats to you.

Nor anybody else for that matter.

We went out of our way to tell you there were no hard feelings towards youself depite the name calling.

We understand you are passionate about your job and opinions.

Others of course just as we do have to understand they are reasponsible for their posts on olo.

I think some people feel because they do not use real name they are not responsible.

We have longed suggested each person use their real names.

We post on here as intructed by olo - simply.

Robert and belly and all other posters we believe in a fair go and people to be treated in the same manner.

So Robert if your fair dinkim about these threads for justice please know a Muslim poster new to OLO was banned simply for suggesting the comments which were outragous posted by ginx should be taken off by OLO. Thats was their only comment.

Please note Ginx is still posting.

We are not trying to get anybody banned including Ginx but we are trying to get justice for this other Muslim poster.

They have said they are so upset they wont come back even if invited.

Even if that is the case it might be nice for them to see a show of support from everybody anyway.

I hope you will all agree its unfair to ban somebody who has been the `least` offender.

It also sends a bag message to our fellow Muslim posters.

We are asking OLO to re issue the posting rights for this person whose only crime was to speak up for us.

I would hope you would all support them.

We are not being anti olo staff either.

Just feel that staff persons actions needs an urgent review.

Lets see if any of you are prepaired to be fair about things and

give this other poster a fair go because this is not fair.

Why not use the car park for the right purpose to help someone whos been wrongly treated.