Robert -

We are deeply concerned and confused you see any attempt to do defend ourselves an attack on you.

How extraordinary.

You` opened this thread to raised serious issues against pale.

Are we not allowed now to defend ourselves?

That is extremely unfair! and a bit rich playing the victim surely.

If it is to be believed the reason you opened this thread was great great “concern about pale miss using forum rules?

You claimed it was done to help pale””?

Yes we did say that the matter regarding your alleged case of Antje`s miss- using forum rules has been dealt with.

That never meant we didn’t reserve the right to respond to other allegations.

Let’s start at the beginning - Your first post shall we?

Robert said-
Refer to a post supposedly by the CEO of PALE under the account normally operated by Antje - http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=874#17174

--
Robert you were upset because you “thought” Antje allowed the CEO to type that message- and to you that’s a breach of forum rules.

Or perhaps that wasn’t the only reason. Does seem rather petty doesn’t it?

What you “didn’t inform others of was pale CEO was responding to ongoing abuse and insults.

You left that bit out!

You went one step further by encouraging this same offender -and also we feel there were posts quietly urging on poor old belly.

We intend to put those comments up left out that the CEO responded to.

Perhaps something other than this concerning you.

We actually Respect belly because he’s a straight up fair dinky bloke, take him or leave him. He wears his heart on his shirt.

Pale asks other posters to read some of the posts addressed to us that ` we` are going to put up.
Please be decent enough to allow us to respond to allegations on this thread.

Possibly there was another reason the pale car park was started.

We ask other posters to another us three futher posts then by all means jump in.

How about a fair go allowing us to respond to this thread

Please.

I agree with R0bert and Belly. PALE has been given enough oxygen in this and other threads - obviously trying to reason with them/her/him/it only encourages them to post more self-obsessed nonsense, so I for one am drawing a line under this thread and the tit-for-tat one started by PALE.

I suggest everybody does the same, and they/s/he/it will eventually get bored with posting nonsense to them/him/her/itself.

Here is the line:

________________________________________________________________

` Morgan `

Interesting you want to stop now. Of course “you knew “where this was going didn’t you!.

You`v no right to stop somebody else’s thread.

My name is Antje Struthmann and I have already explained I am German born but do the best I can with spelling and English.

That didn’t stop you though did it?

I do not know what you think I have done other than respond to constant abuse from yourself and others.
Here`s just some-of the posts I responded to>


Morgan Said PALE your Crazy mad ARNT YOU?

Yes, it's really great PR for 'People against Live Exports and Coherent English'.

Posted by CJ Morgan,

This other person is very much in bridge of OLO rules"

What on earth does this mean, and why do both 'PALE’ and 'TarynW' use the same malapropism?

This being "in bridge" has featured prominently in posts from PALE members recently - but what are they talking about?

They might of course mean 'in breach', but that would be a curious coincidence.

Interestingly, their website (http://www.livexports.com/) says:

"Antje Struthmann

Known as the Marsupial Whisperer, Antje is the CEO of PALE and a close friend too all animals."

Hilarious,
Posted by CJ Morgan,


PALE. this thread's about Boazy's OBSESSION with vilifying Islam. It's not about your appalling manners and diction, and neither is it about animal welfare.
CJ Morgan,


"Stop bringing in lebs and Asians!"

NO TABBOULEH! NO SUSHI!

Clearly, the answer to knife attacks is to issue everybody with a gun. And to ban immigration of 'lebs and Asians'.
Posted by CJ Morgan,

PALE ~ You're a moron. Racist pig. Get back to saving cows. You've got ZERO idea, and if you're the quality of Hansons support, thank christ that scrag won't make it past the hick bandwagon.
Posted by StG,


Robert.

I dont wish want to keep posting these types things on internet.
I question your reasons opening this thread on a minor complaint
You overlooked all the above and much more .I think you were angry because you didn’t like something Taryn said

Ok,
So now we have racists, plebs, incoherant and coherant, it's and thats, he's and she's, know-all's, professors, anti-christs and still we divert from the initial thread of "a PALE carpark"

I think I will gracefully bow-out of this one, there are way too many people about to get hurt, what with the racism thing going on, I don't know why this ugly word had to even come into it, but it did.

Cheers guys, see you in the next thread.

Spanky

Spanky

Your correct. I have upset you. I apoligise.


I was finally felt forced to to display what I see as hypocracy. Robert KNEW these comments were made at us.,

To the other posters-

On your thread Robert that you "claim to have put up to assist pale"?

So far we have threats to contact people who partly fund pale to cause trouble with the intention of having those funds stopped and disunity.

Our funding details. Thats our funder and our President and others.

Her faimly operate a international business.
She also owns an investigation company.

Robert you did not open this car park aimed at pale "to assist at all."!
The evidenve was not balanced and fairness was absent in your first post.
Also the abuse thown at pale you have sat back and said not one word.
"Yet you claim you wanted to help us".

I also have a message for you from our President.

To Robert
PLEASE STOP NOW AND THINK OF OLO IF NOTHING ELSE EVERYBODY
+= Robert next time anybody wants to shave an enquiry get somebody with experience.

You have left a trail of evidence that you have taken a one sided approach to our organisation in its attempts to defend itself.

" This started simply because somebody said Robert you cant run other peoples lives."

However what people "say" and do "does" effect their lives.

Any loss of funding due to threats on your thread will be treated seriously and responded to.

Likewise for damages directed at those persons or person who did take place act in any manner said verbally or in writing or contact made by that person or persons in carrying out a threat to act for the purpose of damaging or doing damage to a personal or orgnisation.

I put it to you that the pretence of being concered about who used the computer was disingenuous.

PLEASE "think of the Animals" and allow Antje to carrry on with her tireless efforts for the Animals.

Spoken by Wendy Lewthwaite
Typed by Antje Struthman

PALE:
"Her faimly operate a international business.
She also owns an investigation company."

Which fact has been repeatedly broadcast on these forums to no apparent purpose other than self-promotion. Is your use of it now intended to intimidate me into shutting up?

PALE:
"Likewise for damages directed at those persons or person who did take place act in any manner said verbally or in writing or contact made by that person or persons in carrying out a threat to act for the purpose of damaging or doing damage to a personal or orgnisation."

Threats, again?

How on Earth could your organisation be damaged by a review of your use of tax-exempt supplies unless you have a case to answer? You're very quick to chime in with pseudo-legal "warnings", Ms Lewthwaite, yet strangely reluctant to do anything at all to offer an answer to simple questions that would clear the whole thing up. Why would that be?