Belly is right. Labor currently on the nose but the Greens even more so.

I have always been against the greens because i knew what their policies were, but lots of people thought they were simply for the enviroment, trees and whales. Now they are waking up that greens agendas cost themand they dont like it one bit.

If the libs, and Labor, have any sence they will publicise the greens policies before the next election, to show how they will cost money and cost jobs.

Belly,

I told you i have no interest to discuss meats Halal meat or live exports. You raised it not me.I went further to say there would be no point in doing so anyway. People can read you know.

This was my last comment to you belly.

Below is the title description of your thread- Now how on earth
am i off topic. Why dont you just tell us WHAT this thread is about because i would love to talk about our trees. ok
Now when your ready we can talk about the trees in Tasi Ok

This is the title?
Take Tasmanian Forest deal,for a start and for a century at least we should plant no less than three trees for every one we cut down.
At some stage it can return to one for one but maybe 300 years away.
I think SOME logging can take place should take place.

Banjo

The fact is ALP only got in because of the greens. The strong support for the greens is but all they have. So what do you see as the answer.
What is it if you like that you and belly see as the answer here.

Even if ALP could get away from the greens- which they cant it would be absolute slaughter.
As I said earlier to belly Gillards is much better than Rudd. Gillard got the greens to vote ALP and not Libs

So why bag her. As far as ALP are concerned most of their problems are from Rudds stuff ups

as far as carbon T goes- Well if she had not had comprimised then ALP would not be in Government

So you tell me your thoughts cheers

Dear Belly,
Pls read your comments & questions to me.

KerryAnne I hope you do not mind me putting a few thoughts to you this morning.

*Yes clearly you care for animal welfare and you Halal meat intentions/ business.*(

.

*RSPCA once a proud name ROYAL no less! now? fools and blind ones
We could do worse than put them in the recycle bin and start again.
Posted by Belly, Saturday, 30 July 2011 6:34:23 AM*

*The live export cattle are not Australian butcher shop meat.
Not yet processed meat either.*

*One day a combination of west coast or NT processing and live exports will being the norm, not yet.*

*Halal remains a market we are involved in and it will grow.
I truly think the damage done to Australian exporters ,the live export trade , was bad.*

Ok Belly, then Kerry sits writing 20 minutes answering all your question - right just go back and look.
I answered your questions that you! raised. I was honest and polite. I took great care knowing the way you fire off at people.

Then: You write this below.? Belly, are you unwell? Do you have a memory problem? I am serious. I repeat YOU asked me these questions.

Remember writing this-KerryAnne I hope you do not mind me putting a few thoughts to you this morning.

So tbo i am a tad confused if not annoyed you that again blast me for what?

I think you owe me an apology . I didnt come here for trouble.

Sorry KerryAnne but you never do your self any favors with that.
You will note I avoid you, others do too.
Now say I was posting in one of yours.
And attempted to move it so very far away from animal welfare Halal Live exports.
I rest my case.

KA,
Frankly it matters not if Labors ineptitude and incompedence comes from Rudd or Gillard being PM. Fact is Labor is not likely to win another term and the greens must accept quite some blame for that.

People hate the carbon tax and the greens will suffer for that and don't forget that Gillard has allocated another 10 million (or is it billion) towards the greens favourate schemes.

Like many I do not think there is any need to do anything as climate change is a natural occurance, and it will change as mother nature decides. People are filled with their own self importance if they think we can influence the world climate. We can't even make it rain when we want and we have spent millions trying. AGW is just a theory, it has NOT been proven.

It has been shown that human induced climate change is a big con job designed to provide money for corrupt researchers. Even today the so called scientist that claimed that polar bears were drowning is being had up for misconduct. Greg Combet and Tim Flannery both have waterfront houses, so much for dramatic sea level rises.

Anyway there is a wide scope for more stuff ups with the carbon tax and the current government, including the greens will pay for that. Wait till the prices skyrocket and heaps of jobs are gone.

KerryAnne I have been on my own now for 20 years.
Not living in isolation, quite happy with myself,often surrounded by my family.
But I just will not be forced away from my own wants and wishes.
By your womanly demands.
Labor has at last come to see it has used the word SOLIDARITY to cover its mistakes.
It yet must CONFRONT it exists not for those in the Parliament, but for the wishes wants and needs of its supporters/members/followers.
Labor, has good policy's, one is carbon change tax, it EXPECTS wrongly,Joe and Jane average to understand the facts.
As of the day Bob Brown let the chance to pass an ETS go, truth is Labor and greens are bed fellows only because no other way exists, YET.
One day, we will, DEMAND an end to voters who think they vote Conservative/Labor seeing their preferences put a GREEN in Parliament.
One day our upper houses,EVERY ONE of them, will be gone.
Think, two shooters party and Rev Fred Nile? Greens and my teams left overs? with the potential to stop legislation by a government with the biggest parliamentary margin in my states history.
Democracy can serve us much better than this.