The Forum > General Discussion > Behind Gillards back flip
Behind Gillards back flip
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
PM Gillard could have because of stupid, unnecessary promise, not accepted the Greens realistic answer to climate change to save face. This would have been the wrong decision for Australia.
The question I am asking, when the present outcry settles is whether they would like to see the carbon tax dropped and no climate change action because of the perception that the PM lied. What is the most important thing to happen now, no climate change action or accept that the PM changed her mind.
Is the alleged lie important enough to demand that the PM resigns. Do we really expect all promises made during an election are kept without changes after the elections. Do we expect that the promises be kept, even if things change down the track, the promises no longer being relevant.
Does it warrant the country going back to an unnecessary election. The carbon tax is not to be introduced for another 17 months. A lot can happen in that time. I say this because all that has been announced is an outline of what is to be put in place. There will be more community and business consultation before the final legalisation is bought before parliament.