Tapp,

I hope I would be most pleasantly surprised by the Australian People's Party and I would like to support an earnest attempt to provide this country with more representative political candidates ( like Rex, if he ever decided to run... Hell yes, I'm serious!) not so seriously compromised by party politics and self-interest as our current bunch seem to be or even a more representative political system than the one which currently attempts to disgiuse itself as 'a Free Democracy'.

I have to say though, you do seem to be making a little bit too much effort to trawl for emailers than suits my level of natural mistrust of my fellowman (a failing possibly? Damn, maybe I'm not 'perfeck' after all?)

Now if you were serious enough to say, have your own website, with maybe all your policies explained along with your agenda that we could visit freely...?

Or is that asking too much for now?

As for being surprised about the Constitution? I believe very little would actually surprise me with regards to that document.

And i believe Australian women will gladly inform you about the Australian male's average ability to offer commitment.

I wish you the Best of Luck.

ok
then

http://www.ozpolitic.com

Go to the APP link

A few good tips there from Braindrain. You could also brush up on your English if you want to be taken seriously.

Steve Madden “Why did your order taker not close”
I was the order taker on that one (I said early research to find out what works) and because the customer was not ready to commit. Simple, alignment of the planets, Steve.

“If I may give a rhetorical answer it is greed.”

I love it when someone suggests the only motivator is “greed”. Such simple single syllables does not explain why someone sacrifices a significant part of their waking time and refinances their house to pursue a goal, when they could go and punch a time clock or work a salary somewhere else.

Suggesting “Greed” was the historic response of the Luddites and the Cromwellian Levelers, Steve.

“Oh he might earn more than me by following his dream, therefore he must be greedy”

Since you are giving rhetorical answers, I will leave you to ask and answer yourself, although people have been known to comment on those who talk to themselves.

Tapp I would have thought, rather than trawling for email addresses to presumably “spam”, I would have spent a few dollars on a web site to carry your message and dropped the url here.

I, for one, would have gone and read the message and decided from there if to email, I did goggle “Australian Peoples Party” and found nothing

Hi Col you obviously missed the link

http://ozpolitic.com

from there click on APP

TAPP

Hi BrainDrain,

"I would like to support an earnest attempt to provide this country with more representative political candidates ( like Rex, if he ever decided to run... Hell yes, I'm serious!)"

Thanks for the compliment, but, as a person who regards himself as a logical, lateral thinker, who tries to move on, based on actual successful results, rather than on failed theories, I suspect that most people would not regard me as "more representative".

I have exchanged polite, informative emails with Tapp and have not been spammed or otherwise intruded upon. Thanks for that, Tapp and thanks for the website posted above.

But Tapp and I have at least one probably major political difference. I'm almost a founder member of the WA Greens. That's not to say that I invariably agree with Greens policies, tactics or priorities, what thinking member of any group, political or otherwise, could not find themselves in such a situation at times?

But, with the importance I place on looking after our environment and the empathy I feel for various disadvantaged people, the Greens is the party I choose to give general support to.

Also, I don't want to be forced to go to work in that most inappropriate [for much of Australia and indeed the world] uniform, the English national dress, the dreadful suit and tie. I tried to post a new topic [got knocked back] a while ago asserting that any man who chooses to dress like this in an Australian summer is an environmental vandal, by causing a ridiculous overuse of airconditioning. I even suggested that, if the relevant figures were worked out, the suit and tie may be the most damaging thing ever introduced into Australia, even surpassing rabbits, foxes and cane toads etc in terms of environmental damage. But when brainwash, superstition and male vanity are the deciding factors, what chance does common sense have?

cont [maybe later]