The Forum > General Discussion > How to prevent or contain terrorist acts in Australia?
How to prevent or contain terrorist acts in Australia?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- ...
- 27
- 28
- 29
-
- All
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Sunday, 21 December 2014 5:49:25 AM
| |
Dear SPQR,
<<Betya it would NOT get past the phalanx of (tax payer funded) human rights lawyers screaming "collective punishment">> And indeed it should not be seen as punishment, but rather as a contractual agreement. Confiscation of assets should not be imposed on family members without their prior agreement - instead, the agreement of the family to have their property confiscated if a member of their family is involved in terror, should be a condition for their relative to arrive (and themselves, if arriving together). They don't have to sign, but if they don't then their relative would not be able to enter. Also, family members who suspect their relative may be involved in terror can be relieved of this obligation if they report in time their suspicions to the police. Posted by Yuyutsu, Sunday, 21 December 2014 8:20:57 AM
| |
Just cut off their dole payments for life, if convicted, including family members. Same should also be applied to all violent offenders and serious criminals who come from families on the dole for generations.
Posted by ConservativeHippie, Sunday, 21 December 2014 11:25:57 AM
| |
The learning that should be taken from the dreadful Rotherham (UK) child abuse scandal where at least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation between 1997 and 2013, is that government takes huge, unnecessary risks in public safety by accepting migrants from cultures with values and traditions diametrically opposed to those of the welcoming/host country.
In Rotherham, migrants from the Kashmir region of northern India imported their toxic political system and culture. <At least 1,400 children were subjected to appalling sexual exploitation in Rotherham between 1997 and 2013, a report has found. Children as young as 11 were raped by multiple perpetrators, abducted, trafficked to other cities in England, beaten and intimidated, it said. The report, commissioned by Rotherham Borough Council, revealed there had been three previous inquiries. ..Revealing details of the inquiry's findings, Prof Jay said: "It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered." The inquiry team found examples of "children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone".> http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089 It is inconceivable given the similarity in Leftist political correctness in immigration and multicultural policy that Australia's federal governments have been cavalier in introducing similar serious risks. Worse, Australia's immigration department has always been poorly resourced and skilled, and even where it rejects an application, its decision is subject to endless appeals paid for by the taxpayer. In Australia, neither side of the federal parliament has shown any particular interest in heeding the lessons evident from the UK Rotherham scandal, or from experiences elsewhere in Europe. Obviously, political parties fear the ethnic lobby in marginal seats. -Just as Labour in the UK feared it and permitted corruption to occur in its own ranks and in civil administrations, including the police who ignored complaints rather than be labelled 'racist' for investigating. tbc Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 21 December 2014 11:57:09 AM
| |
contd..
Banjo, the crux of the problem is that the political parties are being held hostage in marginal seats by the ethnic lobby. That and the ABC misdirects a sizeable lump of the $1.4 billion it spends annually on social and political comment and programming to suit its informal editorial policy of Leftist 'Progressivism'. The public's only recourse is to continually tip out federal governments. Posted by onthebeach, Sunday, 21 December 2014 11:59:39 AM
| |
Yuyutsu>> Another is to destroy the houses of terrorists - it really works as a deterrent.<<
I don’t believe the“terrorist” angle is valid onnly to terrorists yuyutsu. Sure they blow up terrorists houses, but of the houses they have destroyed since 1967 only a fraction were “terrorist” related. Systematic generational genocide is what the Israeli destruction of homes is about. Posted by sonofgloin, Sunday, 21 December 2014 12:09:32 PM
|
If the Left did their job and shut down Islamic extremists with the same zeal as they attack other people whose ideas are in conflict with their own it'd never even get to the courts. Leftists are quite happy to use violence, property damage, slander and stand over tactics to try and shut down conservative Christians or right wingers, even non whites like Danny Nalliah but they won't go near radical Islamists.