Csteele is a bit lost using things like the end of a war that saw Japan commit so many cruel mass murders and rape.
Yet conveniently only remembers its end, not the deaths of hundreds of thousands of soldiers in an invasion, but a quicker end.
Not even getting close to that country's hate filled cruelty even to its own.
Helpful however, in taking the spot light from those csteele defends,and from the thought they, by inference,are free to say as they wish,we are not.

At the end of the day, Australia is not a place for the Muslim faith, as we are, and should always remain, a peace loving nation.

Now if the Muslims didn't support those within, who support violent acts, such as beheading, it may be a different story, but their religion does support such acts, so the only option for us, if we wish to continue our peaceful existence, is to ban the religion, not the people as such, but the religion.

Of cause if the people wish to continue practicimg their religion, then we won't stop them, they just have to find another country to do it in.

There is enough evidence from countries that have been open to multiculturalism, far longer than us, to suggest multiculturalism if a failure, where Muslims are involved, as they (or a large portion at least) simply will not assimilate and will not respect us for who we are.

Do we have to be slow learners all the time!

Beautifully said rehctub. I was composing the very exact thing when I read your Post.

Csteel: “The atomic bombings of the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki quietened the japs down in the mid 40's.

Deflection! again! The World was at in a horrific War at that time. The decision to drop the bomb was the lesser of two options. When you only have two options, you take the lesser. Unless you follow Islam of course. Strange thing about those two cities. The prevailing thought is that no one can live in a nuclear devastated area for thousands of years. What, Nagasaki & Hiroshima?

Answer my questions please. I'm sure everybody here is waiting, with baited breath, for your answers. Let have a show of support here.

Jayb; csteele's question to me was not about Hiroshima at all but
about the unnamed mass of people referred to loosely as moslems.

csteele;
I don't think the case you used would be sufficiently specific to
support a charge, and it could not be shown that the speaker had any
possibility of causing anyone to act so.
However an imman in a mosque saying that those that insult Islam or
the prophet etc etc should be killed is very different.
He may well have followers that would do just that and it can be
shown that is just what they did do in other cases.
Also the Koran tells them that it is their duty to do so.

I presume that you can see the difference.
Further I think that the Koran may well be an illegal publication
because it does advocate the killing of Jews and other persons not
of the Islamic faith and those that oppose it.

It would be an interesting exercise to publish a "New Bible" that
advocated the killing of moslems under certain circumstances such as
the destruction of churches. It could lift chapters from the Koran
and just change the appropriate words.

I can only presume that there would be an unholy uproar, (pun intended).

Just because the Koran has a first publication date in the 7th century
does not excuse it from our laws.

An interesting exercise, for a lawyer that wants to take the risk,
would be to initalise a case against an islamic bookshop !

Sorry Bazz. Interesting case about the Koran you bring up. Charges; incitement to riot. Incitement to kill. Incitement to paedophile. Incitement to bestiality. Incitement to commit Treason. Bloody 'ell, the list would be endless.

Csteel: I find your refusal to answer my questions insulting & I am offended by your lake of response. Did you watch any of the Video you asked for? After all I did go out of my way to accommodate your request. Please, I implore you to give a straight yes or no answer to my questions.

csteel & others of your ilk. I just see one of your friends has killed 5 innocent civilians in Kabul, but I suppose you would think that it was OK because it was for Allah & the cause.