Belly, get you own jokes, the condom joke was mine, no second prizes.
How about this one.
What is the difference between a Greenie and a puppy?
A: A puppy stops whining after it grows up.

Yes Philip, getting answers is difficult.
My question is still unanswered.

Why should we bother ?

Dear Bazz,

I can't find where I have failed to answer a question directed at me by your good self. If you do so and it is germane to the issue of poison propagation then I am more than happy to address it.

What I am not going to do is provide a soap box for its further spread by answering questions purely designed to do just that. It would be rather self defeating one would have thought.

csteele - Being selective again, please just admit you are out of your depth here, if you read my questions a number were directed at your statements so by your reasoning your statements were not relevant to your own thread.

Dear Philip S,

You know full well that most of your questions were designed to further propagate your poison.

But since you have been so persistent how about you answer the question about the 'Sheik's' right to free speech and to offend without sanction by the authorities and I will answer one of your past questions or a new one, poisonous or not.

Dear Mr Steele
In accordance with the ideal of free speech, I support the right of the Sheik to free speech and to peddle his brand of "poison" as you put it.
I think all ideas should be allowed into the light of the public arena, whether they be "poison" or not, but I reserve the right to examine them critically and be free to comment in any way I choose about them.
I will not submit to any law which says that I cannot speak out for fear of hurting anyone's feelings, and I don't agree that anyone should have the right to sue at law for any such "hurt feelings". And that goes for me too. Of course there has to be some limitation such as incitement to murder...but I don't think that is free speech in the way it is generally accepted, and in any case is currently proscribed by law.
It seems to me that you see very clearly the "hate speech" of the anti-Islamist posters, but not that of the Islamists. Curious, isn't it...