csteele, when are you going to realize that you are a tiny minority, fighting a loosing battle.

I have two very simple questions for you, which I hope you do answer.

Q. Do you think there is a serious risk that along with any decent muslims we allow into the country, that there posses a risk that we may also 'unknowingly' allow a terrorist, or potential terrorist in as well?

Q. Now if you answer yes, then is it really worth the risk in your view, given that ONE SINGLE TERRORIST or potential terrorist IS ONE TOO MANY?

As for multiculturalism, I share the same views as Phillip, along with millions of other Australians I might add.

It appears our governments are slow learners, as I heard once that the definition of insanity, was to do the same thing over and expect a different result.

csteele - I notice there were a number of questions and point you failed to address, let me guess they were inane questions to you.
Further
Quote "Multiculturalism has most certainly worked in this country with different groups being able to make productive lives " We are talking about the recent ones THEY DO NOT WANT TO ASSIMILATE TO OUR CULTURE, they want us to adopt theirs.
I am sure some people here that live in certain suburbs would totally disagree with that statement.

Quote "I am extremely proud of that Australia holds out its hand to refugees, I am less proud of how they are now treating them but we have been able to hold our head high among the community of nations for our commitment to carry some of the load of the dispossessed and persecuted."
All I can say is you have been brainwashed, a number of countries including Israel have told the refugees not to bother they are not welcome.
So you want to hold out your hand to them 85% on welfare after being here over 5 years, nice big families like the one in your above link DOLE BLUDGING PARASITES.

Quote "You want to trash that history." They are trashing that history faster than I could.

You comparing this situation to "Rwanda" is ludicrous.

Just watch what happens to Gillard at the election, that will tell you how many people want these welfare for lifers.

Quote "Please don't give me any talk about the 'good Australia' when you clearly have little idea what that means." Now that is an inane statement.

Well lads in a couple of posts you have raised the fears of Muslims over running our neighbourhoods (in just a few years I might add) of assaulting our daughters and of being potential terrorists.

You really are committed, professional agitators aren't you. You claim comparisons to Rwanda are ludicrous yet it is not that big a leap to calling refugees cockroaches. By all accounts you have your incited, disaffected youth gathering, ready to start beheading when the time comes.

Actually I don't really think you are victims of our media, this is just your personalities. The grave danger is that your poison infects others, especially our more impressionable.

You and you ilk right now pose a far greater risk to the social cohesion of my country than any migrant ever could. I am becoming more concerned about an Australian Anders Breivik, incited by people like yourselves than I am about a Islamic terrorist act.

This has to stop. Really think about what you are doing. If you really value this country you will pull your heads in and temper the rhetoric. It is having nasty and virulent consequences and will surely end in tragedy.

Csteele, having read and reread your opening post, I am still not sure whether you are against the language used, with all its expletives, or the message, or both.

If the message was delivered in cool calm language, which would be reasonable under the principle of freedom of speech, would that be ok? I’m not asking if you agree with it or not, just whether you think it would make the difference between being acceptable or not.

Could you please clarify. Thanks.

csteele - It has to be noted that you still fail to address the questions people ask of you, and any point they raise.

Quote "You and you ilk right now pose a far greater risk to the social cohesion of my country than any migrant ever could." I beg to differ in so far as I pose no threat to Australia except in your narrow field of vision.

Here are some more questions for you.
1) Can you explain why on most boats there are 95% men only - whereas in Africa Syria and other places the refugees are women & children or whole families?

2)Do you think it acceptable that they travel at great expense past and away from other countries that could offer them sanctuary but not a golden welfare for life system?

3) Do you think it acceptable that when arriving a lot do not want to learn English when the opportunity is offered therefore rendering them-self unemployable for life. (It would takes YEARS of lessons to get them to an English level of competence to allow safe employment. The English level of the majority is ZERO.

Quote "The grave danger is that your poison infects others, especially our more impressionable." NO my big fear is that there will be no future for our descendants because of them.
The budget for this financial year for them is $6 BILLION dollars this does not include the billion to keep our navy out there as a taxi service, the hundreds of millions given to the charities to look after the approx 12,900 released into the community (NOT ONE HOMELESS REFUGEE) The $2 Billion dollars for drone aircraft to patrol for them and make sure they get here safely even though they are in Indonesian waters.

Even the UN has said a lot are economic refugees.

Would you also have the same opinion you have if your daughter was one of the 6 girls sexually molested by the refugee at the Darwin swimming pool or one of the other cases well known?

It was not social media but main streem press that bought to all our doors the following this week.
The reports of two was it more? gentlemen who wrote insulting letters to the famillys of our dead soldiers.
And those nice folk who in defense of a God that, like all Gods never existed.
Tied a man down to his bed and flogged him.
While no fan of csteele, and unlikely ever to be so, I think under different circumstances he would tell me my evidence is from a small section, not the whole.
May I say the rantings of one, in a medium that see,s a great deal of that, is not evidence our country thinks that way?
And highlight that far too many think as my quoted evidence tells us?