Gosh this post has gone way past its useby date.

When I see comments concerning “soft wear“, I presume it refers to some form of thick knickers which cushion the nether regions from sitting on hard chairs for long stints, laboriously typing in the OLO posting page.

No Col Simply 'some peoples' heads.
Pity you people didnt put a little more effort into thinking of your fellow creatures than being arse holes but according to Yabbs its genteic.
So guess we are lucky really.

Yup I use voice instead of typing. Sometimes it works sometimes it plays up
That allows us to do our main work. When you all try as hard as our office full of volunteers come back and see me.
Mean time Rudds created another job for the boys club by appointing a court worker to look after the bush and agriculture.
in QLD.
That ought to help our farmers heaps!
I dont think.

Hi all

CJ Morgan and ColRouge, I couldn't agree with you more. If I remember correctly, PALE said not that long ago that its Voice Recognition Softwear (sic) was new, so what's the story with all the rest of the posts? There doesn't seem to be a whole lot of difference to me. My experience with VRS is that in general it's reasonably reliable but you do have to check it. Anything less is either laziness or illiteracy. It is no excuse for the appalling communication errors we see here. PALE, for one, I think you mean "vested" interests, not "vetted", do you not? And "misled for "mislead" (VRS would certainly have identified THAT one).

The point we are trying to make is that poor communication skills do not engender any confidence in strategic, networking or business ability.

Nor, if I may say so, does "hanging up in his ear", as you said you did to your friend the AFIC leader. May we suggest that a bit of refinement in terminology might be appropriate too. You continue to claim that you "do not have time" and you work "20 hours a day" (I think was claimed on one thread), but what do you actually do? We are waiting in endless suspense about that. Just a few shreds of evidence would help.

Your website clearly has not been updated in years, you do not apparently do anything active in animal cruelty matters, you have seemingly no-one left in the animal advocacy networks who will speak to you, so please tell us - what does PALE really do, or stand for (other than slaughterhouses)?

Yabby, it is kind of you to offer to remind my failing memory in case I forget that I've said that I do not condemn the entire transport sector (I rarely have any problems with trucks carrying containers or refrigerated cargo, for instance). I'll check out your links a bit later - thanks.

Cheers
Nicky

Hi again all

Yabby, thanks for those links. The second was infinitely better than the first, but still did not provide any particularly scientific information which is what you claim you base your assertions on.

Obviously the male and female genders of any species are different. It was interesting to note that the male brain degenerates quicker than the female in humans (that could explain quite a lot), and the (abbreviated) papers on Alzheimers and Schizophrenia were interesting. There was not really any foundation to be found there for some of the gender-based innuendo you sometimes subject us to with regard to emotional intelligence. Think about it - there are women out there that you'd hate to meet on a dark night in the bush and men who are total wimps. You simply can't generalize to the extent that you do with any credibility.

Equally, some men are more affected by animal cruelty than some women; not all women give a damn, but, as a return sweeping generalization, men seem to be better at it overall.

Cheers
Nicky

PALE&IF: << Yup I use voice instead of typing. Sometimes it works sometimes it plays up >>

Oh OK - your "soft wear" can recognise "arse holes", but it doesn't handle "deranged", "disgust", "disappointed" and "relationship" (nor apparently "software"). Riiight.

I detect a porkie here, which I certainly hope is comprised of free-range pigs.

Ooo look! There go some flying past my window.

Hi all

CJ Morgan, it is interesting to note that neither of our posts in regard to PALE's communications has merited a response, no matter how coherent/incoherent, or about what form PALE'a actual activities take. "Porkies" indeed.

Cheers
Nicky