The Forum > General Discussion > Very few people will bother to do this but- Say something for God sake if you care at all
Very few people will bother to do this but- Say something for God sake if you care at all
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- ...
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
- All
Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Saturday, 17 May 2008 9:05:36 AM
| |
"In your own case, not only do you lack the qualifications, your
ideology prevents you from being in any way objective. So your opinion is worth least of all." That's an extremely accurate appraisal of your own ideology Yabby - well done and the Swiss would certainly agree that "your opinion is worth least of all." You see the Swiss are soon to legislate for the protection of other species from the sadists and the ignorant who ill-treat them. They have already banned battery hen farms and while this is just the beginning, the current proposal will further protect animals from cruel livestock owners, who will no longer be allowed to tether horses, sheep and goats, nor keep pigs and cows in areas with hard floors. If you were a Swiss, your penchant for hog-tying your livestock could see you behind bars. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article3818457.ece http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=7364 I'm confident you will have much in common with the author's derisive view of the Swiss in the OLO article - an author who seemingly too has a belief that other living species have been placed on this planet to be exploited and tormented by predatory humans. Switzerland is light years ahead of Australia which is a country dictated to by the medieval swill who swagger through our halls of parliament and who pander to the greedy wishes of Australia's sub-terranean rodents and rock-apes. But times are a-changin' cowboy. History will not afford you the respect and kindness you crave and which you deny to other sentient beings. Posted by dickie, Saturday, 17 May 2008 2:48:42 PM
| |
Yabby,
I have seen a few comments on other post where you point out the world is over populated. I am just wondering what your thoughts are as to how this should be attacked. It would be clear to everybody we have already lost more than one third of wild life. Fish life perhaps a little more. You cant say throwing millions of sick and dead Animals along with the polution from these boats does not effect our system. I am just wondering why you wouldnt object to live exports on that bassis alone. Also reading many of your comments you clearly think we as people have the right to just take life from other animals. So here the question and please answer it. What IYOP do you think 'we' people are here for? Posted by People Against Live Exports & Intensive Farming, Saturday, 17 May 2008 5:39:25 PM
| |
Muldoon lived alone in the WA countryside with only a pet dog for company. One day the dog died, and Muldoon went to the parish priest and asked, "Father, my dog is dead. Could ya' be saying' a mass for the poor creature?"
"Father Yabby (an animal hater) replied, "I'm afraid not; we cannot have services for an animal in the church. But there are some Baptists down the lane, and there's no tellin' what they believe. Maybe they'll do something for the creature." "Muldoon said, "I'll go right away Father. Do ya' think $5,000 is enough to donate to them for the service?" "Father Yabby exclaimed, "Sweet Mary, Mother of Jesus! Why didn't ya tell me the dog was Catholic?" Posted by dickie, Saturday, 17 May 2008 7:13:05 PM
| |
The Live Export Industry will be the topic for the ABC Radio National -792- Australia Talks programme on Monday 19th at 6pm..The promo cites a leading Islamic Cleric raising legal opinion re the transportion and slaughter adhering to Islamic principles.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/australiatalks/ Last time I looked at the RSPA site it's poll about this trade showed 83% against and only 4% in favour-- Posted by digiwigi, Saturday, 17 May 2008 7:49:53 PM
| |
Many thanks Digiwigi. Much appreciated.
Posted by dickie, Saturday, 17 May 2008 7:56:21 PM
|
Sorry. Thanks
Nickysaid
PALE, the AVA...
palecomments
I don’t think the Government would go there. Could be stopped in a heart beat. Job for the unions :)
More pressure on AVA is a ‘good way’ IMOP
Nicky said =
I haven't said I am happy about Hugh …
Palecomments
TBO its interesting Hugh`s saying the Handle with Care 'reject' our offer 'again' to be involved with our MOU for animal’s welfare with Muslim Leaders.?
Invitations have been sent to Hugh and RSPCA National for six years. That’s a matter of record.
Instead we are told RSPCA and Handle with care will approach Muslims Leaders leaving pale out of it. How interesting?
No =.. We can’t force Hugh to do anything - that true.
We are just ‘very aware’ of Hugh.
I recall at a meeting between our lawyers and the Federal Ministers advisor, certain information was given.
Was regarding alleged (or undertaking) by Hugh and RSPCA CEO UK to Peter McGauran.
We sent it to AA in confidence. (That’s another story)
Soon after Hugh resigned as president of RSPCA but kept his President of WSPA.
Just 'prior' to that he rejected pales application to be member society of WSPA.
Makes you wonder – speaking of money. Just what makes these people tick.’
You may not like us Nicky but ‘rest assured’ WE ARE on the side of the animals.
Yes we are suspicious of "some" group leaders.’
Why on earth would you ban and black list a group of unpaid people who did what RSPCA and others should have and could have done years ago.’
Is it only that they want the credit and any funding?
Umm, I think its more.
We think its political – pluss the funding and they want the credit for our work.
They have ZERO knowledge and background.
Any interference now could bring down everything set to play for the better outcome for animals. We “won’t” risk that.
Let us WSPA in your ear=
Handle With Care Hugh.