why does it belog to the aboriginals, if we were not here they would be japaniess

Rainer

The first thing I was taught at university was I was not allowed to think for myself. You could not say what you think, you had to cross reference to the opinion of someone else. Needless to say I didn't last too long.

Now I see graduates of uni being brainwashed into quoting from green left weekly and still incapable of drawing from life experience, still needing a "source". I know all the university graduates arguments by rote. They don't have many sources.

I do not see that as being intellectual at all.

Tony Kevin
you need to distinguish between 'anti Jewish' statements aimed at ALL Jews (and are worthy of condemnation on racism grounds) and statements which mention factual situations of social importance that happen to involve Jewish people. The 80% control of Hollywood is a well attested figure, and the impact of this was CLEARLY revealed during the period surrounding Mel Gibsons The Passion. It was all over the Media how he was not able to get support for distribution and other things BECAUSE of the power of the Jewish level of control of Hollywood. They said as much themselves.

The mention of ethnicity/Religion is VALID when the ethnicity or religion forms a basis of extending networks of control, such as in the case of the Sassoon family of Opium war infamy in bed with the British Royalty . Their distribution network was specifically and deliberately "Jewish" and as such, is a vital fact of historical importance when considering issues of nepotism and discrimination.

On Cronulla..and the fiasco of Police mishandling of the footage we all now know about.. and the police threat to industrial action... UNLESS we are given very good sound reasons for the 'different' (the cynical (or accurate) would say 'discriminatory') operational procedures which allowed footage of Anglo attacks but NOT Leb gang attacks to be released to the public, then I suggest to all police who are involved as follows:

RESIGN and be replaced by those who are up to the task

REMOVE all females from front line gang related reaction teams.

RENEW your motivation to PROSECUTE the now IDENTIFIED perpetrators in the revenge footage

READINESS to use your service firearms to even up the odds when confronted by larger numbers of people.

REVIEW the policy where police make 'tactical' decisions in the interests of the officers.. and remember u are serving THE PUBLIC i.e. US... and instead of thinking of your welfare... think of OURs who you are employed to defend.. see the above point about evening odds.

Maybe the Police didn't release the tape because it wouldn't have made a difference unless those in the tape confessed and admitted that it was them. Chances are that those on the tape all had the same name anyway and the resources needed to find them would have been seen as "not worth it" as those accused could have denied it was them, they do tend to look alike, their families could have acted as alibies and the Police would have gone around in circles and they would have gotten off.

We all know that even being caught on tape doesn't seem to be enough evidence to convict. Being unable to convict the offenders even if they were on tape would have looked worse for the Government. Now it just looks bad for the Police involved and the Government, well they know nothing as per usual.

How the Government is handling this is no surprise. The are always required to rely on what they have been advised and they are required by law to believe what they have been advised. Innocent until proven guilty. They are not required to ask questions even if they are being advised by those that are said to be responsible.

We all know how Governments deal with allegations, you cant prove anything if by law there is no proper or fair investigation that is required to take place. Makes it really easy for things to be covered up.

Meredith,

How is our diverse society better than one that isn’t?

How is our diverse society stronger than one that isn’t?

The answer to both of these questions is, of course, in the negative. Mantras such as “strength in diversity”, “our strength lies in our diversity”, and so on, are complete nonsense. Even if we put aside the fraudulent political policy of multiculturalism, which has so infected all Australian politicians and other self-servers, there is no logic in their claims. The exact opposite to what they are saying is true.

Australia is not yet a multicultural country in the political sense that our divide-and-rule politicians and the industry into which they pour huge swags of money wants it to be. We are still a core culture with minority multi-cultures at the edges. The newcomers are still being drawn into the host culture, and there is nothing, as yet, to prevent that if that is what they want as, I believe, most of them do or will want to do in the long run when they learn what the political classes are up to.

Most lay commentators who are proponents of the disease of political multiculturalism – as opposed to the natural multiculturalism of non-discriminatory immigration which we have had for some time – are totally unaware what it is all about - i.e. the enforced political type being touted world-wide. Different cultures will not hurt us. Governments enforcing the differences will.

It’s good to see your posts and the obvious work you have put into them.

As Rainer correctly acknowledged, the vast majority of this discussion has been disgraceful. Usually not surprising yes, but some of these posts have truly made me feel sick. I thought such neo-racist, intolerant and prejudicial comments belonged in a period 70 years ago in a country now incorporating the former Prussia.

What gives any of you the right to spout such ridiculous generalisations? I am a 7th generation Australian, and I do not feel like I have any more a right to exist in this country and exercise my prerogative than someone who was made a citizen yesterday. Hell, why should I? After all, they have immigrated just like my ancestors did.

Fredreich, please keep your white supremacist tripe for you neo-nazi KKK websites, and save me the disgust of having to read your ignorant, unaware posts. Perhaps a quote from the man you praise:
“The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently.”
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Dawn, Sec. 297

I am sure the great man would be ashamed to have someone of your ilk citing his work.

Meredith (“if islamists were actully treated the way they treat Australians”) – newsflash – Islam is a religion, not a f*#king nationality. Someone can quite easily be both, contrary to your own ignorance.

And ‘net noobie’ (“why does it belog to the aboriginals, if we were not here they would be japaniess”) this country belongs to the Aboriginal because he OWNS it, via birth right. I probably shouldn’t have acknowledged your barely literate response with a comment, but I felt obliged.