September 18, Monday morning media announcement of Australian first class/year, third term in school, Phonics test giving media something to discuss, sounds on face value, a good idea. Hearing in a media discussion, if children can't read before aged 8 years, children will find learning to read even more difficult.

Children finding learning to read difficult I suggest aged 8 years children are doing so after having experienced force learning practices, that children not being able to grasp memories quickly, remembering learning traumas begin mounting up, trauma awareness being reinforced every event on being forced to read something.

Earlier this year on hearing a British expert on Phonics, came out to Australia to promote Phonics as learning to read method mentioned ideas (inspiring me to remember) that 300 individual group letters sounds could be taught. 300 sounds memories for aged 6 years children would be too many to teach when merely getting same aged children to remember 300 words in picture form would begin children reading, children working out more difficult words, knowing how letters can be worked out by knowing what picture imaged words, letters have sounds.

Solving parents complained problem about children's poor reading skills, opens up other education department methods used since the beginning of letters having sounds, thousands of years ago, letter alphabets replacing symbolised picture images.
Schools switching from remembering image spelling method to another sound spelling method as solutions to poor childhood learning. My assertion being Phonics will open another practice of government childhood psychological mental abuse.

As a recent documentary indicated, alphabets were designed to replace symbol picture image communication, allowing anyone to read. The problem doesn't lie with which method, as reading maturity soon realises letters red in picture form, intelligent children will realise multiple letters have sound patterns, figuring out difficult words.

My concern is that parents and teachers will force onto children a rushed need to remember picture symbol letters as sounds, turning sounds into words, many children are still figuring out how to use difficult meaning words in general conversation.

The excuse of solving poor literacy by introducing old ideas, my assertion being the problem is children are learning to control emotional intelligence, what to do when faced with unknown situations, what emotional fears not knowing what to do fears persuade solutions reducing fears, providing optimal solutions.

By placing young aged 5 and 6 years children into hurried environments before children have solved many not knowing how to act, how to respond correctly, learning to read only to be fed fairy tale murder stories, establishment further increases fake story redirections, confusing child-like intelligence, into my constant accusation of education holds children as Neanderthals preventing children from developing Homo-Sapien intelligence on their own unmanaged by adult prescribed experiences.

First day of school, teachers divide children into classroom groups, A to whatever number of children for each class label letter, placing the academically best potential children in A grade, whom parents are teachers and/or of some management employment, determining whether young aged children can read, having been taught to read by their parents.

Not surprising to find the most disruptive children in the lowest grade, allowing disruptive children to infect each other with Neanderthal emotional desires. Placing worst behaving children with more worst behaving children, children never being able to correct their own behaviours. Adding academic mental stress, depriving poor behaving children thought productive time opportunities of solving poor behaviours.

Children on first attending school having been baby sat by television's fast moving commercials, fast action good verse evil cartoons, compared to younger age slow moving do little puppet cartoon programs. Third choice being morning news and talking over each other information entertainments.

My criticising many fast spoken programs: The House; News and Current affair... programs provide no real face to face communication, other than “Neighbours” dramas soap opera understood themes. No incentive to quickly understand what may be happening on programs or in family life, as repartition will fill any gaps children may be missing, children can remember.

Children on attending school must sit and listen to a single teacher whom often shows children tasks only once, that children then repeat what a teacher asked children to do many times over.

Young children with poor handwriting motor skills, asked to write down alphabet letters, before many children can slow down fast physical hyperactive memory skills.

Other than pushing pens, the only physical tasks provided to children are often ball movement Neanderthal incentive driven sports.

My suggestion, first few years in school has more to do with verbal interaction communication between students, how to act between one another about ideas related to one another. Media often talk about leader behaviours many dysfunctional behaviours drive media entertainments. Behaviours are not what to do rather than what to do. Curse words enter conversations limiting detailed expressions, indicating limited time to think out why responses can't be rationalised. Conversations lack why people become overwhelmed by unexplained emotions and beliefs. Why people believe in a magical god yet can't reason out why no god could exist nor if a god did exist, why would that god be listening to believer's prayers.

Why people test their emotional memories for indications of fear or pleasurable desires deciding beliefs, before testing rational seasoning on reasonable probability, asking for further evidence before leaning towards believing or deciding disbelief.

Such Homo-Sapien learning decision making skills before caring about reading proficiently, I believe is far more important. Once children choose a behavioural pathway of emotional Neanderthal behaviours, thereafter persuading a rational behaviour pathway, merely comes difficult, having been hurried into deciding many simple behaviours self-rewarding intelligence with brain chemical stimuli.

I pose that reading words being solely a visual recognition behaviour, reading is simple. What represses reading behaviours are traumatised memories of teachers and/or parents forcing too much reading too quickly too soon before children can reduce dependence on Neanderthal early age physical movement learning.

Neanderthal intellectual intelligence reading of information merely confuses comprehension, leaving readers to read simple to understand: murder; describing physical movement; Harry Potter... book readings. Neanderthal university students need to remember individual procedure facts rather than Homo-Sapien complex concepts, Homo-Sapien thought easy realisation awareness need only to apply concepts to a wide variety of tasks.

Aged 5 and 6 years children would be better served if they were asked to do line dancing, teachers politely instructing young children on how seeing mistakes and correct performance emotional awareness is directing their own physical movement. As movement falls into place, being aware of fears and correct judgements desensitises need to feel knowledge.

Once children using feelings of fear, not easily understanding academic tasks, many hours of mental exhaustion punishes wanting to read anything, determining they don't like school work. Long term memories are least desirable to except school work. Periodically asked to do line dancing feeling physical rewards for performing line dance tasks correctly, academic work tasks are least likely to be remembered.

Teaching profession relies on difficult to teach traumatised children, allowing society to need more teachers. Deliberate Sabotage.

I know a person whom says he has an A grade class school education. He claims year 9 LAPLAN tests determining academic writing skills, skills should have been learnt while in primary school.
Maybe education departments should give primary teachers LAPLAN tests, to determine whether teachers are failing to teach basic literacy skills.

Media, particularly television require no tests to determine whether listeners are paying attention. Program name “Are You Paying Attention”. Human memories are not required to take notes to an over supply of useless information media provide. Much the same information applies to school work, that all sentences adds up to nothing worth remembering. Tests are merely determining if students can do the work, rather than whether students can think based on collective information. Media murder stories are little more than personal information which adds up to nothing, at final end of stories important clues are mere few words stated during stories.

Analogies, could be that schools over task while under inform what tasks are about, leaving gaps in why students perform tasks. Sabotaging actual learning by denying students rational purpose teachers and educational departments in fear students actually learning how to learn correctly, students no longer needing school teachers.

Teachers telling young children once, having justified themselves as teachers. Students whom heard yet weren't correctly shown what to do, carrying out school tasks as though children have the intelligence of aged 6 years children. Year after year being graded little better than as aged 6 years student task performers, deliberate sabotage.

The many aged 7 years children diagnosed with ADHD hyperactivity, slows academic task memory learning, hyperactive behaviours are repressing learning traumas, learning traumas being normal human learning behaviours not to do tasks which shouldn't be done. Many more children not being diagnosed with ADHD are also using similar tactics in repressing learning traumas due to teachers being forced by education departments to force memory tasks onto young children not yet mature enough to think how best to remember academic tasks.

steve101

SBS is running a weekly series shown on Wednesday evening “The Good Fight” this series is a TEN network spin off from The Good Wife.

From the beginning of the The Good Fight series, the underline continued theme has been about a rich family running/living off an investment company Ponzi scheme.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

How Bernard Madoff run a Ponzi investment scheme for several decades without being audited is a mystery why government authoritarian regulators didn't question Madoff for so many years. Fraud estimated to have been $64.8 Billion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Madoff

My accusation is that capitalism is part Ponzi scheme, creating employee and director: management fees; wages; commissions; bonuses. As money turns over through banks, large sums of money credits are being recorded.

Recently mentioned during a “The Drum” program, female guest statement that Karl Marx didn't invent communism, Marx merely theorised whatever economic system was being used, systems boom ending collapse.

My theory is that developed counties are creating an investment finance boom with very little to invest in. European government bond providers are asking investors to pay for the privileged of governments holding their money using negative bond rates.
Triple A rated counties bond yields are so low high yielding investment opportunities are difficult to obtain. As investment companies and share equity providing companies show above yields, my speculation is companies aren't making real profits, as high commission charges can't have had many remaining profits left to pay expected promised dividends.

To cover up actual investment low returns, similar to 2008 GFC, periodic crashes remove balance sheet zero return profits. Using escape goat Bernard Madoff as a fall guy for billions of dollars which didn't exist, existing only on Madoff's own company paper.
For decades Bernard Madoff was living the high life, chosen by establishment due to his facial feature low intellectual ability persuasive looks, Bernard Madoff in his old age takes responsibility for lost money, going to jail. Similar to Eddie Obeid and friend.