I express finance news stories daily market movement reasons, does not prove that finance media statements are true.

Texas USA has a large population percentage whom believe god is a magical creator, providing believers with god given benefits. Listening to Texas pastor Joel Osteen, god has a set course for every devoted to god believer. After Texas has experienced many years of low rainfall drought since 1981, indicated by an Alan Kohler chart shown on ABC evening news August 29. Now Dallas Texas is experiencing floods. I theorise, Texans whom are experiencing stressful moments caused by flood rains, given an idea that god doesn't exists shown by years of drought, broken by record rainfall flooding, added fears of being wrong, being duped by preaching pastors, fears being felt often believed as incorrect will guide believers to believe in god with increased devotion.
The lack of experiencing independent thought, moments of independent contemplation have since childhood, been hijacked by religious feel good simplistic self-rewarding conclusions of wanting to understand bible babble magic, often reinforced by parents.

My suggestion that children shouldn't believe in anything until children age out of Neanderthal emotional decision making behaviours. Long hours of classroom tasking should not begin before children have abandon favouring feel good behaviours over sensible long term beneficial rational argument understanding. Once experienced rational thinking children feel they're being overly mentally stressed, children realising the differences between favouring emotional decision making due to being stressed and Homo-Sapien reasoning, persistently complain, avoiding long term mental illnesses.

As I believe the above makes a great deal of sense, old establishment theories want to control citizenry lives using lies, poor shallow excuses, fake democracy elections, persuading young adults to participate in far away wars, defending democracies from forced labour dictator governments.

Recently ABC Compass ended a 3 part series entitled 'The Staffroom'. Teachers were seen in short sentence scenes talking to teenagers in several schools. Media interviewers can script teachers answers to what producers require citizenry to believe. In similar situations interviewers can ask many questions, camera image on interviewer during questions, camera on interviewee during replying answers. Editing can edit out teachers least positive replies, using many teachers asking each teacher the same questions, editing questions and replies so only one teacher is asked one of each of the questions. In the end watchers are left no wiser than before series programs began.
Once more program information became personal, program information focusing attention on personal history and ability beliefs, irrelevant to student education beliefs. The program The Staffroom was about teachers not students.

With all the many media panel discussions on mental health, knowing teenagers suffer extreme mental anxiety leading up to HSC examinations, does any media bother to suggest asking teenagers particularly of the lower grades, what their mental anxiety opinions are?

steve101

ABC regressive dogmas cause much more mental health issues than they solve.

On Tuesday August 29, SBS2/Viceland presented one of my most looked forward to series, Adam Ruins Everything. Adam informed program viewers world art auctions and galleries are creating fixed exclusive to selected painting buyers, art market pricing using an exclusive number of recognised art evaluators.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw5kme5Q_Yo

Adam began by theorising why The Mona Lisa painting has been recognised as priceless art, that post 1900 The Mona Lisa was not even considered as worthy of criticism. The Mona Lisa painting while hung in a gallery, having been stolen, wasn't noticed as missing for 2 days, remaining missing for 2 years, the painting developed a significant amount of news media, creating a popular curiosity within public memories. Mona Lisa, such an easy name to remember, as easy as remembering Diana.
I suggest if Diana had her full name and title mentioned every time her name was mentioned, I speculate Diana would not have obtained her popular supposed interest by the not so very intelligent citizenry.

Adam's claimed theory, on the return of The Mona Lisa to a gallery, the painting was recognised as valuable by the same art critic person/people whom judged The Mona Lisa painting as worthless before the painting was stolen. Adam describes the event as populism, supporting the popularising of ideas and items with an introduced qualified expert.

Adam further describes rich people buying up selective name artist paintings wanting painting valuations increased through auction faked bidding and/or valuated by recognised valuators as increasingly rising valued art. Auctioneers bidding up paintings using people holding phones, bidding over phones for other people and/or chandelier bidding.

Valuated art, rich people donating over valued art to charities to create tax deductions.
Selected highly valued artist paintings are sold to a limited membership club of clients, keeping out new buyers wanting listed painters art.

What allows this fraudulent art concept worthy of exposure, is an idea called “sarcasm”. When something appears ridiculous, commenting what is ridiculous, as though the ridiculous was believed real, testing whether people in the surrounding location detecting whether what was ridiculous was believed. Realising that people believe ridiculous statements to the humorous delight of a number of people in the know and/or know better of such ridiculous assumptions.

Wednesday August 30, ABC “Utopia” episode, head of the department lead character was constantly making comments, leaving secretaries asking “was that sarcasm?”. The Big Bang Theory Sheldon often inquiring whether replying comments were sarcasm.

My argument theory is that much of what is presented in the media is sarcasm. That a number of people in society are aware most news media stories are fooling badly educated public whom believe anything they're told, entertaining people whom can recognise sarcasm and to those whom are employed into the establishment, whom have been told what to expect in media news stories.

Alan Bond supposedly went to jail for stealing a painting from his shareholders, stated as worth $? million. Alan Bond heard saying the painting was worth “?” he would know because he was at one time a house painter. Sarcasm many times over.
http://dailyreview.com.au/alan-bond-the-dodgy-art-of-speculation/25071/

Australia buys a Jackson Pollock Blue Poles painting for $1.3 million, now believed worth as much as $350 million. The painting is a bunch of random paint can splashes... artistic sarcasm.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-10-07/governments-$350m-painting-should-be-sold-to-reduce-debt/7911882

A close examination of The Mona Lisa painting shows a poorly painted bleary background, I expect, excuses are by creating 3 dimension background being out of eye vision focus. Myself having seen many documentaries showing similar aged art paintings, many faces have the same famous Mona Lisa characteristic smile. To those whom recognise The Mona Lisa as nothing special that art is in the eyes of the beholder, realising people believing The Mona Lisa is something special are fooled by media populism and merely repeating mythical statements, as though school taught children to answer examination questions using book taught statements.

There are a significant number of old art which contain rather interesting history stories which indicate why art was painted and/or statues were created. Theorising paintings like simple image Mona Lisa containing little know evidence who she was, lack of historic story depriving listeners of taking any notice.

Art Of America documentary series host narrator takes ridiculously simple images, expressing named artist's art as brilliant expressionism. Any intelligent person watching will (I believe) pick up on the simple images descriptions as over the top fabrications. Together with realising school education turns potentially intelligent children whom could have turned into Homo-Sapien thinkers, that school education has turned children into believe almost everything humans are told Neanderthal aggressive sports action lovers and/or clueless Sheldons. Thereafter establishment confidence tricksters making assurances the establishment won't mess more Homo-Sapien listeners around because listeners know too much.

Regardless whether realising many sarcastic media over the top fabrications: man walking on the moon; space probes sending radio wave transmissions through billions of kilometres of charged particles by the sun outer space. Lengthy distances themselves will soon after transmission of radio waves, radio waves will fade into nothing.

As church religions teach children invented facts being: happen many years ago; very far away; presented by dressed in colourful clothing priests... school education uses: long ago dead dinosaurs: far away planets and space probes; too small to see DNA... sarcasm is no different to those in the know now, to those in political power centuries ago, controlling peasant citizenry using religion.