The Forum > General Discussion > What is an 'appropriate response' PM?
What is an 'appropriate response' PM?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Mr. Turnbull and Mr. Joyce.
You both have had a lot to say about Pauline Hanson's call for a halt to Islam immigration, yet aside from saying she is crazy yo have said nothing. You have not put one reason forward as to why you oppose such action. Do you not think it reasonable that the public should expect you to have reasons and for you to state those reasons. I would like to know why you object to this move. Is it because you are afraid that local muslims might object and riot, or that you may get personal threats, or do you think muslim nations may reduce or curtail some trade with us? Do you think or hope appeasement will eventually prevail?
If that is the case, I ask how many terrorist attacks will it take to change your mind? How many Australians need to die before you take action to reduce the risk. How many terrorist attacks or how large do they have to be? Obviously bigger than Bali, as that did not premote any action.
Finally I ask, Given that you oppose stopping muslim immigration, what are your plans to curtail or reduce the risk to Australians from terrorist attack. Or do you just accept the increasing risk as the numbers of muslims increase.