The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > What is an 'appropriate response' PM?

What is an 'appropriate response' PM?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. All
Dear Josephus,

I have written on the topic of fundamentalists and
Islam.
We may never understand
what motivates Muslim militants. Humanly speaking
the future appears bleak for the Middle East and
much of the Muslim World. However as I've stated
repeatedly - I do not believe in stereotyping all
Muslims.
I have nothing further to add.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/27/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/
Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 10:15:17 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy: We may never understand what motivates Muslim militants.

No. You speak for yourself. You don't want to understand.

You only want to see the Flowers. Those flowers are grown in dirt. The flower, itself, looks nice but it dies & turns into dirt again very quickly.

I, & most of the people on here, know exactly what motivates moslim militants. It's islam, the koran & the hadiths.
Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 11:37:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Jayb,

I have more faith than you not only on the people
who post here but on Australians in general who
can tell the difference between the sheep and the
goats. And will ignore the siren call of demogogues
and false ideologues.
Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 1:02:01 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Some of the really ill-advised and tragic US foreign policy is reputed to have been based on the 2,400 year old myth that 'the Enemy of My Enemy Is My Friend'.

The Leftists are trenchant critics of US foreign policy and most likely would agree with the above.

Yet the same self-loathing Leftists allow their hatred of 'Whites' - the 'white' Settlement of Australia - to convince themselves of the necessity for an overarching policy of multicultural 'diversity' to dilute and one day extinguish any remaining vestiges of 'White' presence.

-An 'Open Door' policy with large scale immigration from cultures and traditions as opposite as possible, preferably oppositional and adversarial, to tear down the British inheritance so despised by Leftists.

What hope then of trying to convince Leftists (they are not the previous Left by any stretch of the imagination) of the need for immigration policy to have any concern or consideration for the needs, aspirations and wishes of the Australian population at all?

From 2009 news report, UK leftists in action,
"Labour wanted mass immigration to make UK more multicultural, says former adviser
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.
He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration" but that ministers were nervous and reluctant to discuss such a move publicly for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote".

As a result, the public argument for immigration concentrated instead on the economic benefits and need for more migrants.
Critics said the revelations showed a "conspiracy" within Government to impose mass immigration for "cynical" political reasons."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html
Posted by leoj, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 1:17:19 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy: the people who post here but on Australians in general who can tell the difference between the sheep and the goats.

That's exactly what I was saying

Most posters on here are neither Sheep, who follow slavishly along with any "Feel Good Lefty Green view," or Goats who are led to the slaughter by Feel Good Lefty Green views, or to get screwed (depending on your Religion.) That is why we have serious misgivings about the increase in Islam in Australia. We see the need for it to be severely curtailed for the future safety of Australians who are not, & don't want to be forced to be Islamic.

You & your ilk are very much in the Vocal Minority in Australia fortunately.
Posted by Jayb, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 3:54:46 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Dear Jayb,

We'll see at the next election as to what
most Australians really think and feel.
Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 29 March 2017 3:58:14 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 11
  7. 12
  8. 13
  9. Page 14
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy