The Forum > General Discussion > What is an 'appropriate response' PM?
What is an 'appropriate response' PM?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- ...
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
Posted by Banjo, Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:12:27 AM
| |
come on Banjo you know that Turnbull is as weak as water when it comes to Islam. If it wasn't for Abbott we would still have the boats coming while Turnbull dines with all the Imans and repeats the regressive mantra that Islam is a 'religion of peace'.
Posted by runner, Thursday, 23 March 2017 4:52:42 PM
| |
Justice Minister Michael Keenan MP says an increased AFP
presence at Parliament after the Westminster attack is standard procedure. "We've taken measures over the past few years to enhance security here," the Minister said. "It's normal after a big international event that we have enhanced the presence of police officers, a more visible presence, and people will see that at Parliament House today." The increased security presence coincided with a State visit by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang who has arrived in Canberra at the start of a five-day trip. Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 23 March 2017 5:29:30 PM
| |
Foxy,
Funny isn't it, restrict gun ownership for ordinary people but increase the guns around Parliament House to protect themselves. No, an appropriate response would be to stop the most likely terrorists from coming here. And breeding here. Great is it not that we provide Phycologocal services for muslim gang rapists in Jail and the phycologist then has an affair with one and then marries another. We are smart! One day somebody will notice that all the terrorists and would be terrorists we have locked up are Muslim. Posted by Banjo, Thursday, 23 March 2017 5:49:43 PM
| |
Using civilian police is not an appropriate response to Muslim terrorists. We are a war with Islam, and only soldiers can fight wars.
Posted by ttbn, Thursday, 23 March 2017 9:14:21 PM
| |
The Muslim Council of Britain has condemned the terror
attack which struck the heart of London. Religious leaders said it was too early to speculate on the attackers' motives. They offered "thoughts and prayers" to the victims. Many public figures including the Mayor of London Sadiq Khan have praised the "tremendous bravery" of the emergency services during the incident. The Prime Minister Theresa May has revealed that the terrorist was British born wh some years ago had been investigated by MI5 over "violent extremism". He was known to security services. However he was not part of the current intelligence picture. And there was no prior intelligence of his intent or plot. More information will be forthcoming. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/london-attack-muslim-council-of-britain-condemns-westminster-terror-attack-a3496876.html Posted by Foxy, Thursday, 23 March 2017 10:42:21 PM
|
Increasing the AFP presence in Canberra is NOT an appropriate response to a terrorist attack.
What is 'appropriate' is to stop more muslims entering Australia, especially the ISIS fighters returning from Syria.
Stop playing around with this and get fair dinkum about protecting Australians. What more warning signs do you need?