The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Can a nation of sports lovers be more technically innovative?

Can a nation of sports lovers be more technically innovative?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All
Trying to formulate detailed posts in 350 word limits, barely allows me to type out a complete essay on posted subjects.

The forum is used more like a chat room, than an opinion forum.

I would post on another Australian forum website, yet by Googling opinion forums, there are very few seen on the search page. No other Australian forums that I can see to be posted on.

I have 18 more limited to 350 words posts, on the subject of bad education, to post after the reject post I reposted here.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 11 February 2016 11:51:01 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Watching on SBS PBS Newshour January 20, 2016, short presentation on when first child' mothers with domestic problems, to better prepare young children for school.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/how-home-visits-for-vulnerable-moms-boost-kids-brainpower/

I have never heard before, therefore I am suggesting an idea. Schools failing aged five years old children's aptitude tests, aged five years children should be prevented from attending school until the following year. Trained teachers taught in child psychology should visit parents to recommend how to best prepare their child for the following year's entering into schools.

Any parents wanting to send their aged five years children to school, once informed that unprepared children may be told not to attend schools, parents will better prepare their children for school rather than leaving children's poor social behaviour and reading and simple maths education to schools. Parents may request advice from teachers and or reading materials on how best to prepare children for school.

Providing advertised website advice on “how to prepare your child for school”.
Posted by steve101, Friday, 12 February 2016 11:46:55 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I suggest, you can't teach aged five years children something they don't want to learn. Children having played with toys: dolls; super heroes figurines; small trucks and cars. Children need to want to sit down and write letters and numbers and do maths related to something visual.

If emotional self-programming young children don't like to be: calm; focused; sitting down, stuck in classrooms for many hours. Children will self-program themselves to hate classroom learning... which is my accusation against education systems for many of societies dysfunctional/violence behaviour problems.

Many children may force themselves to comply with adult demands, yet, long hours of forced school work will not feel desirable emotional satisfaction towards wanting to work. Many children will force self-programming to work, yet, are more self-programmed robots than thinking humans. Anything not related to and beneficial to focused work will be ignored and walked away from. Hence my repeated idea that school is “educating children to keep themselves dumb”.
Aged five years children unprepared for school work will self-program themselves to emotionally dislike work for their entire lives.

If children were more self-controlled, least under influences of emotional self-programming. Children bored with toys, wanting to move on to something more advanced. Older aged seven to nine years children, having better physical motorised skills hand control, would easily learn how to write.
Too early to learn children, learning to handwrite at too younger ages, prevents poor handwriting skills to be better re-programmed into handwriting subconscious hand movement memories.

Learning to read during young ages, allows young children with childish emotional self-programming imaginations to only want to read childish imagination stories. Easy to understand childish stories felt as emotionally rewarding will emotionally self-program children with fantasy stories unrelated to modern real life self-programming prompted memories. Add years of schooling mental stress repressed memories conditioning. Which could result in very childish understanding grown adults. Exampling character behaviours of 2004 movie Anchorman: the legend of Ron Burgundy. Many employers may deem such characters as unemployable.
Posted by steve101, Friday, 12 February 2016 11:48:39 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Much the same idea as religion states “get children onto religion when they're aged five years... that religion has got them for life”.
Stressing young children then guiding children onto sports fields and or reading assumed easily understood fantasy stories...religion and politics included.

Anchorman: the legend of Ron Burgundy, and Anchorman 2, characters portray people who know no better, whom feel what they do and say is intelligent.
I suggest, Anchorman character behaviours, by saying something that is spoken with correct English, childhood feelings of achievement are felt. A lack of good rationalised judgment expertise childhood experiences prevents realising the poorly thought out statements maybe: stupid; sexist; racist; narcissistic. Supporting ideas by feeling intelligent by further saying, “that's the way we are... that's the way we were brought up”. Feeling good/smart/true about saying the simple sentence.

I suggest children need real life experiences, action situations, change from one state to another state, seeing results, concluding thoughts, children learn to predict outcomes, are what young children need to experience to remember solutions... long before academic learning begins.
I am not talking about simple competitive sports.

Education systems use children's young ages as excuses to withhold practical thought learning, keeping children clueless. Exampling 1995 movie Clueless.
Years of mental stress results in: “educating children to keep themselves dumb”.

A past Australian 60 Minutes story, interviewing a mother who has an over active aged five years boy, who was not sending her child to school until the following year, when her child was aged six years due to the boy's hyperactive behaviours will disturb other children, that the boy will only want to run around in the classroom.
Posted by steve101, Friday, 12 February 2016 11:50:34 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Here is my true story experience learning sample of the problems with society. I don't often communicate with many people, yet this is a sample of the few people I had in the past become friendly with.

Almost thirty years ago, I met a girl, I will call her made up name “Grail”, a girl. At the time, she had been on a deserted wife's pension for the previous two years. I eventually met her family. The family was brought up in the western Sydney suburb, St Marys.
Thirty years ago, St Mary's residents don't dare leave their motor vehicles parked in the streets over night otherwise there exists a high probability the vehicles will be stolen, my theory, stolen by (bored, angered by bad school education, getting out of the house due to unhappy alcoholic parents arguing) groups of teenagers walking the streets at night.

Grail's brother had an aged seven years boy who could barely be understood when he speaks. Grail believed the boy's not employed mother spent most of her day spaced out on marijuana. The boy wasn't even placed in front of a television screen to watch cartoons. When I heard the boy trying to speak sentences to me, I tried to get the boy to speak more clearly. The parents immediately interrupted me and told me what the boy said stopping the boy's further attempts to speak more clearly.
Having met the boy twenty five years later as an adult, the man works with his father, father who has long ago divorced from his wife, the mother of the boy. The boy as an adult can't talk properly. As I asked how he was, the father and grand mother (Grail's Mother) interrupted further conversation as in “No No No”. The poor speaking adult I assume is on a Centerlink pension.
Posted by steve101, Friday, 12 February 2016 2:35:32 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Grail's first marriage, children grown to adults, as young children were educated for a short period at St Marys school. Grail's eldest child, now adult aged thirty nine years, four years ago seen by myself to be constantly big notes himself. I conclude as a young child, the boy learned to stop his mother speaking to him (at a fast talking adult speed), traumatising him, interrupting his mother by big noting himself. Not that intelligent Grail, school educated at St Marys, merely stopped talking, walking away, rewarding Grail's aged nine year boy for big noting himself. He probably did the same big noting himself tactic to school teachers, stopping teachers from giving him a difficult time. Someone should have corrected this big noting bad Neanderthal narcissistic behaviour.
As an adult he constantly takes over conversations, blocking anyone talking to him, big noting himself.
Grail's big noting adult son's girl friend who has a child with him, I heard from her lips while she was talking to the above mentioned grandmother, that she will eventually leave her big noting boy friend.
The family were on Centrelink unemployment benefits.

I assume employers would soon realise Grail's big noting son is unemployable.

I also assume that there exists files on each person's intelligence skills capability and employment history in which establishment controlled employers can assess what employment needs can be filled with available unemployed personnel.

I also believe planned projects are only held back due to available skilled labour and or machinery, rather than available finance and or tax payer budget restraints. Establishment inventing money for wages. Boom bust cycles are used to encourage saving during booms periods, workers being fearful of limited work and busts, money lost during scary decline recessions and depressions, keeping the working class poor, always in need of work. Anchormen intelligence beliefs restrains workers from realising an existing establishment is inventing money for wages by immature childhood early schooling child self-programming.

I can't prove anything, readers can't prove me to be incorrect, other than forcing their own anecdotal media propaganda story beliefs back at me.
Posted by steve101, Friday, 12 February 2016 2:37:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Page 8
  10. 9
  11. 10
  12. 11
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy