The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Can a nation of sports lovers be more technically innovative?

Can a nation of sports lovers be more technically innovative?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. All
The woman who pushed a policeman over into a garden during the 2015 Melbourne Cup. Did so on a dare, to create opportunities for memories of childish fun. Doing so landed her a criminal record, a fine of $800, and though stated as an embarrassing event, made her famous if only for a short time.

This examples badly thought out spontaneous actions can lead people down pathways of enjoying criminal activities. Not needing lists, yet bad boy bad girl behaviours lead to trying illegal drugs, to becoming addicted to illegal drugs.

Doesn't seem to matter how much television advertisements are broadcast. Drug addiction and alcoholism problems seem not to be falling away.

Who do I blame: religious ideology natural selection justification; schooling education limited thinking practices; mentally stressful curriculum; world standards Naplan testing figures propaganda manipulations.

Educating children to keep themselves dumb...
Posted by steve101, Tuesday, 16 February 2016 3:33:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Recent media presentations on home schooling reports home schooled children/teenagers do well in Naplan international examinations.
One criticism is home school students don't receive the communication social skills opportunities school students receive. One home schooled student being interviewed seen mildly finding that claim humorous.

When media was describing home schooling parents teaching school curriculum while some children said to be allowing children to teach themselves, showing children climbing trees, creating opportunities for viewer negative judgments.

In media presentation on home schooling, there's no statistics mentioned on: mental depression and other mental illnesses; illegal drug usage; number of adults held in jails.

What wasn't stated was that parents in most instances were intelligent enough to realise both private and public schools were terrible environments to teach children and teenagers information. Parents believed they could teach their children the schooling curriculum, resulting in better long term results. I don't believe many parents would want to and or could do the same.

My argument is with the curriculum: The amount of hours spent rolling over the same curriculum, wearing down child curiosity learning desires; the limited Homo-Sapien thinking intelligence needed to pass examinations; the mental stress persuading students to be more into simple sports than formulating better solutions to futures probable problems.

Schooling environments, reprograms humans judgmental instincts... humans not realising incorrect beliefs based on poorly analysing past memories, excepting believed media's repeated produced memories to be true. An ability to doubt, to rethink, seems to be missing from human intelligent behaviours.

I believe my readings try to put forward arguments for readers to realise some reality in overall society behaviours: out of control post HSC teenagers' poor learning capability; alcohol abuse; drug use; motor vehicle high insurance company risk examples. Only people with reasonable or better thinking skills can realise something to do with school education, is wrong.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 18 February 2016 11:37:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As I put forward a number or arguments, spending time formulating better arguments. Coming to thinkable argument points of view, using as few words as possible. Not trying to ramble on using names, not broadening conclusions and few to no redirections. I increase my ability to formulate arguments and persuasive influences, providing readers are willing to believe.

My argument is that school education does not provide similar opportunities for readers to think as in to reflect on topics that effect their lives. Politics and religion are often about something too far away; to small to see; long ago events that support a reality of the system organisation: political parties; capitalist companies: religious sects. Individuals can find few personal learning benefits in media and school curriculum.

I accuse school curriculum to be filling Homo-Sapien brains with irrelevant information that prompts possible intelligent brains to self-programs brains to answer questions in time limited, anxiety, simple memory scanning behaviours from memories containing easy to understand information. Examinations merely test whether students can robotic-ally memorise information under mentally stressful conditions.

I conclude, home schooled children whom were allowed to educate themselves, teenagers would understand my arguments, having no schooling traumas, understanding, remembering conclusions longer than children having undergone school education curriculum day after day, year after year starting aged 5 years.

Home schooled children not having to undergo education department's curriculum, seen climbing trees will soon become bored as natural child curiosity desires children to move onto something new.
Learning children starting with half an hour of maths being careful not to overwhelm child curiosity, soon children will be into answering maths problems correctly, wanting more difficult problems to solve. This being the idea that children should choose what to learn and how advanced learning material should be.
Children will soon realise passing examination qualifications will provide easy employment opportunities with high paying wages.

Leaders don't want capable thinking people realising future opportunities' easy ways to create wealth. You the reader feel therefore believe otherwise, influenced by media propaganda that leaders want people to be rich, paying higher taxes.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 18 February 2016 11:39:26 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Catholic church wanted people to work exhausting work for promises of buying believers into an afterlife heaven. Constantly wanting money from believers for a variety of god's work projects. Church selling words. The church doesn't want to sell believers anything that the church wants for their own needs during a time where resources are few, populations numbers are many, the few people allowed to be wealthy in control (early democracy), want all resources for their own desires. The value of money is the cheapness of available labour and a need for cheap labour to work exhausting labours to obtain money. Balance the point at which working classes rebel against tyranny. As past populations have rebelled against wealthy class organised tyranny, the trickery of democracy for everyone, and media's constant divided up, not conspiring with each other establishment scandals propaganda has convinced many badly education citizens working exhausting many hours of work, democracy provides long term rewards.

Where religion constantly wants money from believers after weekly expenses left over wages, capitalists management (priests) wanting left over weekly wages to invest in economic growth. Wage inflation removes much of saved money's value and boom followed by fake dust cycles removes money from being spent.

Removing education department curriculum leaves, not traumatised by school education, teenage brains, capable of thinking, remembering without attached traumas to learn: touch typing; computer maintenance; computer programming; tax laws; accounting; studying electronic components and electronic schematics; building construction regulations and codes; property conveyancing.

Obtaining books that will convey easily understood information may be difficult to find, yet as all that is relevant in society is learned by teenager self-learners, images of complex workings prompts understanding to reinforce memories of past readings is what real education should be about.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 18 February 2016 11:41:40 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
School education curriculum forced 110% information hurrying learning, not only destroys child curiosity, traumatising future learning. Children faced with mounting work loads, begin to cut corners: scanning over work; ignoring home work; ignoring processes. Add increasing mental stress repression, whatever behaviour feels least mentally stressful, leading to poor focused behaviour. Cutting corners becomes a life long behaviour.

Whatever many similar school curriculum subjects were learnt. Being that learned subject have little to do with long term employment work tasks, most all information learned under mental stress, will be forgotten. Years of repeatedly cutting corners felt to being rewarding behaviours, will remain for entire life times.
Workers not being time pressure hurried, may even look for ways to cut corners, in order to feel rewarded for performing cutting corners tasks.
Reward feeling maybe so intense, people may feel there is little reason to perform selective tasks unless they can feel smart for cutting corners.

Exampling hospital patient infections, doctors and nurses not washing their hands, infecting patients with long term medical problems. By forcing mental stress over work loads and performance issues. Failure to perform hand washing tasks allows doctors and nurses before attending patients, to catch up with increasing work loads.

I knew a lighting shop, shop assistant who failed to write down promised planned tasks for customers, customers were to pick up completed tasks at a later date. When customers returned to pick up completed tasks. The shop assistant having failed to do anything, was having his day off. Other shop assistants knew nothing about what tasks were needed to be carried out. Because the shop assistant to blame for not writing information down was part owner of the shop and related to other owners, nothing was said. Years later when something was said, the shop assistant to blame, excuses were that he had to serve the next waiting customer.
The shop assistant to blame was merely programmed to hurry through processes based on shallow assumptions prompted by images. Not bothering to remember past needed tasks to be completed the minute the shop was empty of customers.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 18 February 2016 11:44:04 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
What's to blame is a shallow hurrying up work school work curriculum, that requires no thought involved and no teacher individual advise that may correct poor performance. If taught by a parent capable of seeing that children can learn at their own pace, that parents and children when seeing problems can conclude on better learning strategies.

School learned students being constantly forced to increase work loads, hate to be told some added task onto what tasks are already over whelming, added task needs to be carried out by a specified date.
Children's increasing work tasks onto teenager ages, eventually teenagers will hate to be told what to do by any person.

Television commercials can inform people: not to smoke; not to take illegal drugs; not to drive motor vehicles while constantly falling asleep; not to brawl in the public places; not to consume too much alcohol, followed by driving motor vehicles; men are not to abuse women; to restrain violent tendencies towards family members; etc. people don't listen because school education has conditioned students not to want to listen, students feeling the hatred for new tasks to be added to what is already creating (true or not) overwhelming mental stress. Even though people not suffering from over worked tasks mental stress... the first indication of some person assigning extra tasks, causes memories of past hatred (fight or flight) to be felt.

Then there's the not so intelligent people who have emotionally taught themselves to rejoice at ideas of increased tasks. Wanting to feel busy to keep up with schooling tasks.

Government controlled education is screwing with human brains in so many ways.
Posted by steve101, Thursday, 18 February 2016 11:45:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy