An innovative tactic would be for US and other military strong countries secret organisations to organise, run and supply their own Middle Eastern terrorist groups. By controlling terrorists groups, terrorism is managed in areas as a population growth deterrent, rather than terror groups being uncontrolled.
US pretending to kill terrorist leaders is good propaganda.

Haven't enough people come from over population growth middle eastern countries migrated to western countries?

Anyone wanting to join terrorist organisations for whatever reasons, not realising themselves are joining first world leaders organised controlled terrorism groups. God, being anything that happens, all very bible story trickery. Be aware of the devil, the devil will try to trick you, natural selection.

The tactic is not ethical yet the tactic is innovatively intelligent.
Can't think Neanderthals will reject everything new that creates thought traumas, feeling everything is false.

Both: Osama Bin Laden, fighting Russian military in Afghanistan and North Vietnam communist leader Ho Chi Minh, stated in years ago documentaries, both persons worked for the US government. Documentaries never stated when each person ended their relationship with the US government.

What is propaganda? Propaganda is information that influences people beliefs: in favour of an idea or ideas; influences people against a county or counties, person and or people, idea or ideas. People being influenced are unaware they're being influenced.

Commercial advertising and politicians would like you to believe they're trying to influence people.
I see political stories influencing people to believe politicians to be not that intelligent, politicians are good at criticising opposing political party politicians, allowing people interested in politics to feel redeemed in criticising politicians themselves... which I believe is intended propaganda, having people feel, by agreeing, they're part of the political process.

Commercial advertising in most cases is entertaining viewers, often ending commercials with a well known brand name.
How many: M&Ms; Round Trees chocolates; Extra chewing gum, after seeing such commercials are you influenced to buy?
My accusation is that most commercial advertisements are promoting products few increased sales will result. Advertisements are there to: entertain; fill in time from programmed productions; annoy viewers into quickly turning off watching, conditioning increased avoidance tactics; quick scene changes are known to induce endorphins in many viewers brains; eventually media will tell people everything is a lie by telling what's happening secrets, trying to convince people an end of time Apocalypse is approaching.
Periods of advertising commercial products used to advertise future same channel programs that could be used to advertise commercial products seems a waste of revenue taxable income opportunities.

A list of Adolf Hitler documentaries over the past thirty years, would add up to a considerable number. In all Adolf Hitler presented documentaries, Adolf is blamed for world war two. Videos images show: military officers taking orders from Hitler; Hitler pointing on maps directing generals what to do; generals seen walking behind Hitler as though Hitler was the leader of the pack; German population believed to be strongly supporting Adolf Hitler.

Why do most democratic governments have few problems while 1920s German government had many political problems that a dictator easily provides stable government? My assertion is that disruptions were intentional to set up the largest European industrial country to start the next great world war. 1999 media suggested the end of the first world war, Germany didn't surrender, instead an armistice was signed. Dictionary: armistice: truce, suspension of fighting. One more bit of information to gain listeners confidence, for that planned Apocalypse soon to come.

History informs people Adolf Hitler was a mere first world war corporal, carrying messages back and forth from front line trenches to command posts.
After the war ended, Hitler, in the employment of the military, Hitler was given the job to infiltrate a political party as a spy, Hitler eventually was made leader of the party. The documentary I watched didn't say when Hitler ended his employment with the German military.

The many documentaries on Adolf Hitler, in today's democracies propaganda value is that Hitler was: a single leader; other than SS, all German commanding officers are not blamed for anything during the war; German population could say they were hypnotised by Hitler's speeches, Hitler's personality and political party propaganda; Hitler was the ideal front man propaganda tool blame it all on one man who dies at the end of the war, leaving no real evidence that Hitler was really dead, doubts.

My conclusion would be that: generals; experienced bureaucrats; other real intelligent influential people would have prevented dictators by organising assassins, blaming heart attack or whatever, to remove Hitler, declaring marshal law, under some violation of the German constitution, arresting party leaders.

One man and or several men could not created that much control over so many generals regardless of previous agreements on increasing military personnel. Soldiers forced to swear an oath of allegiance to Hitler.

Many people believe conspiracies don't exist due to, for two reasons: few stories exist that increase credible ideas of conspiracies; the media are constantly reporting scandals.
I say, having read that, Catholic church pope scandals have been reported in some media form, for hundreds of years. Popes being accused of living rich luxurious lives; the Vatican surround by prostitutes to service priests' sexual needs.
Google: “vatican prostitution” also “pope scandals”. Scandals are part of good propaganda. Citizens have a belief they would hear all goings on secrets if personal sex scandals secrets are being expressed. Few people can think to realise scandals are entertaining to working class and propaganda.

…........................

Advancements in science is propaganda. Media announcing new drug cures, trials will take five years to complete, trails never heard of again.
Space: shuttles; rockets; Space Lab; International Space Station weightless experiments; Mars Rovers; space probes. Occasional news stories to reinforce advanced support for moving forward technology.

A belief in future technology needing skilled thinkers in maths, allows children supported by parents to chase school education's HSC grades. Parents dreams, pushing children to do well at school.

Technology innovation inspiration is propaganda.

“V for Vendetta” 2005 movie, extreme British government dictatorship ideas in the movie story, started by a virus pandemic. The V movie shows government created the virus. A political party leader came out saying support me and I will protect Briton from enemies and enemy inflicted viruses. Gradual: change; repressing opposition of any kind; media and television that represses independent thought; people feel safer from enemies that weren't really there in the first instance.
Note... a propaganda idea: dictators don't like embarrassing media stories by television host Stephen Fry. Murdering Stephen Fry in the movie.

Media reminders: ISIS; Adolf Hitler; drug cartels; Ice; Cocaine; movies like “V for Vendetta”; 1950s Cold War duck and cover; Communism; pandemic viruses; Batman and similar hero movies defending honest citizens against evil villains. Such media stories has almost zero propaganda value on myself, as I don't feel information to be subconsciously understood, emotionally judged, as though school conditioned myself to behave.

Ideas of educating children to keep than selves dumb, is not part of media villainous stories. My accusations of “schools educating children to keep themselves dumb” is difficult to believe, because media propaganda leaves out such ideas and that governments are believed to be wanting increase industrial productivity using correctly educated skilled workers, increasing tax payer's contributions. Governments are believed to want to increase GDP figures to allow their policies to be reported as working better than past opposition political party in government, increasing votes for their political party at elections.

My accusations are that both main government parties are really one party concern public relations propaganda tool. Sports loving people understand: two teams; two players; two political party, aggressive competition. Day after day of political party aggressive competition is great propaganda.

Innovative thinking example:

The mosquito carried Zika Virus mentioned in the news has been around for a while. Coincidently the “V for Vendetta” least ten years old 2005 movie coming out at almost the same time media made the Zika virus a major news item. Question is did Zika virus announcement wait until the programmed movie “V for Vendetta” was programmed to be shown at the same time?

I make no claims that Zika virus is a conspiracy similar to the V movie. That would be dumb. Any mention I have made to the move has nothing to do with the Zika Virus.

I am aware emotional decision making people not liking my ideas would invent some ridiculous idea that I was accusing some world government conspiracy, to create a virus to reduce world population growth. Many media fiction productions create such ideas, yet I am not going to follow media conspiracy fear stories.

I could suggest the Zika virus and the V movie were in the media at the same time to allow people to conclude conspiracy theorists are placing both ideas together, quickly concluding the conspiracy theorists are dumb. That's most probably another example of how propaganda works.