Malcolm Turnbull's 'Technology Innovation' speeches are good leadership moving forward under media statements of falling commodity prices and believed end of the Sydney auction house buying boom, share markets falling, doom and gloom.

As a sports loving country: plenty of sunlight for all year round open air sports; school sports grounds with seasonal better feeling sports curriculum; plenty of weekend sports, gambling opportunities. Childhood easy to judge self-programming pathway pursuits, allows technology innovations statements to be falling on many death ears.

Malcolm Turnbull promotes “Cultural Change” towards family violence with the person of 2015 Australian of the year, Rosie Batty.
There are very few words that I have heard stating cultural change towards technology innovation.

I conclude, changing a cultural of contact sports, being for most school children, being limited choices of judgemental achievement.
Reading, writing and maths are easy to learn. School science lessons are limited to limited numbers of short periods in high school.
Does a HSC graduate student know how a transistor works?

Like religion's idea that “if you get them when children are aged 5 years, religion gets them for life”. Early childhood culture of playtime and lunchtime sports, relieve stressed child brains for not feeling good about having running around behaviours restricted in classrooms, particularly boys. Guides child brains towards out of classroom competitive physical contact sports. Long hours of children's built up classroom aggression is released in playground sports and or playground narcissistic bullying.

Rosie Batty spent her time as 2015 Australian of the year, talking about family violence. Malcolm Turnbull believes talking about cultural change is the answer.

Solve one problem “family violence” by changing school playtime cultural by measuring the amount of playtime violence and aggression, reducing early childhood classroom environments restricting behaviours, encouraging, rewarding calm thought out self-calming behaviours.

Multi channel television allows young children more choices to switch channels, allowing children to watch whatever violent cartoons that stimulates fast moving colours excitement.

Should there be more television calm Chess playing programs allowing diverse choice, giving at least a small number of children a curios alternative to violent television?

Ummm... We ARE.
Don't you know the government has done some kind of a deal with Apple.
Children in public schools parents are now forced to purchase only iPads (at retail of course) in order for their children to learn.

That's technically innovative, isn't it?

The main barrier to any innovation while we have Turnbull as PM, is Turnbull himself: he is a waffler, not a doer. The man has done nothing but grin and yap since he stabbed Abbott in the back - except, of course, to prove that his first attempt at politics with an application to Labor (who didn't want him) was suited to him and his Socialism. The man is a great danger to Australians in all things. As a long time conservative, I hope he and the Leftist who helped him assassinate Abbott get their comeuppance. I'd put up with Labor to see that.

The culture of sport, judgmental behaviour messes with human thinking.

By criticising politicians, limited criticising sounds very much like criticising sports players after matches end.

Thinking out a complex behaviour in detail, rather than judging a behaviour is innovative.

School children working with tablets on school wifi systems sounds innovative, yet what type of information will be asked to be searched for. History is out of date regardless where history lessons medium comes from.

A past reading on distracting sports entertainment post, "A schism of endless possibilities" on sports faked entertaining reasons. Sport is very important to working classes judgmental self-confidence. Sports entertainment enjoyment are MORE important than who wins sports matches. For me to say that limited judgmental behaviour directed at sports is what I believe, allow labour forces simple work tasks to be worth doing, are for many people the only rewards in life. This being my reasons for stating why technology statements are somewhat misleading.

I stated that professional tennis players seen on televised tournaments are playing to audiences enjoyment. Often tennis players are mixing up the rallies having tennis players returning tennis balls to opposing players, missing opportunities to take points. Sometimes easy openings to score points, sometimes being far away from optimal returning tennis balls, that hitting tennis balls for point scores, would be better than returning tennis balls to keep tennis balls in play, to have tennis balls returned while being out of position, losing points. This above theory seems correct to me when watching televised tennis matches.

Humans easily react to visual images. The idea of fight or flight human natural selection survival of the fittest god. Myself watching tennis players making mistakes, balls being hit into nets, has me judging that if the ball went over the net, the ball was going to land outside the court parameters.
Having quickly decided that this form of judgemental behaviour was too simple, I immediately stopped being drawn to making simple judgements.

The above two paragraphs are why televised tennis matches are ridged. The first paragraph distracts people's attentions towards simple visual sports. The second paragraph self-conditions simple feel good judgemental behaviours. The human condition to feel intelligent has Neanderthal feel good is true emotional (narcissism) self-gratification reinforced.

Young children using emotional programming to self-program behaviours are what allows humans (as in all mammals) to be motivated towards continued child curiosity.
My observation is that unprepared to attend school, children still under the influence of emotional self-programming: met with poor visual environments classrooms; gradually increasing punishing mental stress; frequent opportunities of embarrassments and forced unwanted labours, will focus attentions away from punishing academic learning, backwards in mental brain development, towards more rewarding visually prompted simple judgemental behaviour' sports.

School education is not moving advancing thinking Homo-Sapien brains forward. Homo-Sapien advanced thinking brains are being programmed to enjoy judging simple sports to medicate progressive classroom mental stress. Humans are remembering sports images while repressing academic intelligence due to schooling's irrelevant story telling and no relevance maths to anything practical, curriculum.

If tennis is not people's preferred stimulation medication: cricket; horse racing; racing greyhounds; gambling machines; arcade/video games; gun toting action movies; competitive spelling bees.
As children grow into teenagers, who can't find sufficient medication using sports enthusiasm, do teenagers delve into alcohol abuse, smoking pot, and illegal drug taking?

Forum users may have great word: schism; etc, and spelling skills, yet can forum users argue that I am incorrect in my analogies?

If forum users want to reinforce ideas that democracy is real, looking after citizens wealth and individual safety, other than forum users continually typing-up paragraphs about democracy as though democracy was a real process, leading Australia forwards.

One simple argument supporting democracy is that politicians are so dumb, they had no idea that sports are used to dumb down populations.
What's very obvious to me, and I am nobody on any education tested level. All those government: advisers; experts; bureaucrats, wouldn't be aware of the same above conclusions.