YOU WILL LOVE THIS ISSIE
in court i was fined 300

i got the 'BILL'..NEXT DAY..
300[WAS ONE Bill]..the bill the judge ordered]

BUT THEN..
BILL NUMBER TWO.. something caled an 'offender/levy'
BUT AS BOTH..*ARE BILLS..I SIGNED THE REMITTANCE SLip..[bill].into promissory/SECurity/AGREEMENT

[A SECURITY].;..THUS I PUT A Large 's'..in red[that signifies/living person]..then i installed A LARGE I..OVER THE 'S'..[THUS=$].the i indicates an insured security.[ie thE VALUE]

WHAT SPERS IS SUPPOSED TO DO WITH IT..IS BAnk it/the bank takes IT TO THE FED/FED GIVES IT TO treasury/treasury presents it to treasuror/who signs it/returns it to fed/FED CREDITS SPERS/SPERS CREDIT QLD TREASURY/TREASURY GIVE IT TO GOVT TO 'Spend'[under the terms of the bankruptcy.THERE MUST BE A LAWFUL WAY TO PAY DEBT/THATS IT.

but few know OF IT
but the law=the law..[fed constitution 115/STATES..NOt to coin money nor make anything but coin lawfu tender/for payments of debt]

well the state/did mint 'legal tender[ie COIN]..IN THE FORM OF A BILL
AND WE Pay the bill with yet other billS/CALLED MONEY[PAYING IN paper-MONEY.is simply trading debt for debt/that is what passes for money..now.]

but the system wants us B.rok.BUT IDIOTS KEEP PAYING DEBT WITH DEBT NOTES.BUT SOME LIKE ME DONT..I REFUSED TO USE R4V/BEFORE NOW..BUT now its going into the systeM..[BY REGESTERD LETTER TOMORROW]

EVEN THIS new 'levy'
thanks be to 'state/penalties/enforcement-act.1999..section38[2]
LOL..AN ACT/PASSED..BY A GOVT/SANS AN UPPER HOUSE/AND DESPITE STATES surrendering the right to legislate to the fed[]SEE SECT 1]/fed con.

http://rss.infowars.com/20140507_Wed_Alex.mp3

i wiL./READ THE ACT.. for you

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/qld/consol_act/spea1999280/

STATE PENALTIES ENFORCEMENT ACT 1999

TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Long Title
ContentsPart 1--Preliminary1. Short title2. Commencement3. Definitions4.

Objects...5. *Act has limited application to children
6. Act binds State, Commonwealth and other States..

Part 2--The State Penalties Enforcement Registry

7. The State Penalties Enforcement Registry
8. Functions of SPER
9. The SPER charter
10. Registrar and other staff of SPER

11. Management of office
12. Protection from liability

Part 3--Infringement notice

ij short/this law/levy..is unlawful..[im not GOVT..IM NOT A CHILD]

ALL THE LAWS ARE THIS PATHETIC/i will be appealing/have the appeal papers..and wilL use this in persecuting the state as unlawfull/that we need AN URGENT CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW/AS AFFECTvly all state legislation is unlawful/but by WEIGHT OF Deceivers/acts to..pay by fraud...[PAYING CASH/NOTES IS ACTUARY CRIMINALITY..and coin is limited tO THE COINAGE ACT/..legal tender SECTION.SEE PREVIOUS POSTS.

which MEANS INDIVIDUALS MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ODIOUS DEBT
[ODIOUS=criminal/its obligation fails on those who en Debited THE STATE/TO THE TUNE OF 85 BILLION[LOOK AT THE FED PANIC Over a mere 30.bilion..[qld is in deep doOD00.]..

Maybe fines should be expressed as a percentage of IQ?

So… why was Packer charged given that Gyngell has taken full responsibility?

Why were either of them charged?

Would two ordinary blokes having a scuffle of that sort, without either of them making a formal complaint against the other, have resulted in charges being laid?

Not likely.

<< The fact that Packer and Gyngell were ever charged says much tor the stupidity and nannyism into which our society is descending. >>

Well Is Mise, it was certainly a stupid and nannyistic thing on this occasion. Whether this is indicative of society descending into a nanny state, I’m not so sure.

I think the opposite is happening actually – the rule of law is being steadily eroded.

An unfair fine on this occasion for Packer at least, if not both of them.

And unfair lack of fines for many breaches of the law, which the authorities are just not dealing with…. not least with many road rules (eg: tailgating).

LUDWIG/<<.So..why was Packer charged..given that Gyngell has taken full responsibility?

Why were [n]either of them charged?>>

im not interested/ENOUGH..in loOking up the details
buT THESE THINGS..NEED BE 'SEALED'-UP QUICKLY..TO get them out of the news..AND NOT BECOME HUGE Persona dramas/where everyone begins speculating.

but tHERE IS any NUMBER/OF BY-LAWS/A COUNCIL/STATE..where precedences/meet the NEED\..this would HAVE BEEN OFFERED Initially/by one or both of their lawyers..and cleanly TO received a fine/is an OFFER..whether they accept the offer/OR not..is beside the point.[its gone/forgotten\NOW..1000= A CHEAP FIX[these elite scum would never of course/FIGHT THE LAW..if its wrong/because they both got rich..on that error.

<<>.Would two ordinary blokes..having a scuffle of that sort,
without either..of them making a formal complaint..against the other, have resulted..in charges being laid?>>

HARD to say/..';joe public'..on a Saturn-day NIGHT WOULD LIKELY/have resulted in a raft of charges/from PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS TO RESISTING ARREST..[YOU CAN TEll these pair woud have resisted arrest/more likely than not you and i would both have been arrested/detained til nexT DAY..

and/PACKER..now be needing to attend..a number of 'appearances'/THAt waste effectively 3 days pay..[TO PROve/he didNT BEGIN IT..PLUS psychiatric evaluation AND SOME COMPULSORY 'REMEDIAL COURSE'..OR jaiL default[GOOD BEHAVIOR/ORDER'So…

<<>.why was Packer charged given that Gyngell has taken full responsibility?..Why were either of them charged?

Would two ordinary blokes having a scuffle of that sort, without either of them making a formal complaint against the other, have resulted in charges being laid?>>

KEY POINT.. police cAN ONLY ACT..IF SOMEONE COMPLAINS
it fives them 'standing'..But the standing must show damages/they could easy refute...the case on standing alone[providing NO ONE ESE suffered loss..

[see if they BROKE MY BRICK WALL/WITH THEIR thick heads/that has given me lawFULL STANDING TO ABATE/THE INJURY]..AND THEY WOULDnt have a leg to stand on

its alL about standing[in law]
and with botany/GOVT HAS NO STANDING IN DECLARING A PlANT A DRUG

<<And unfair lack of fines for many breaches of the law,>>

2bctd