Agree Chriss,

But OUG cheats and gets over the word limits by joining words together.

while reporting "..counter intelligence"..by those justifying those subversive activities...the agents of REDIRECTION..

VIA AVOIDANCE/RIDICULE..redirection//negation..ignorance and TROLLING AND via AD ADUMBRATE..enact ridicule..as...disinformation iys a large part of its covert action commissioning in their alloted..area of irresponsibility, and the.. people who are the primary target of its ridicule/..via COLLIDING lies."..simply sHRUG AND LOL.

BY GOLLY...OLLIE
YOU PAIR OF SPOOKS DO/TAKE THE CAKE
YOU ADMIT TO NOT READING ANYTHING..YET STILL KNOW ITS Wrong

gee..by osmosis these geniuses still remain ignorant/thus ignored

OUG'

Just going on past performance we'd know that it's wrong.

is*de'mise../quote....,<..Just going on past performance
we'd know that it's wrong....>>

just going by past life experience..
those not grasping the concept.s..skip past that they dont understand
and GENERALLY..correct errors..witH THEIR OWN FACTS..[but clearly..if you cant grasp the science/you skip blissfully ignorantly by

IMAGINE YOU HAVE A FUNNY SPOT..appear on your face..
do you a/ ignore it..or b/..get it seen to..or c/tell everyone your IGNORING IT..TO AVOID THEM BUGGING YOU ABOUT IT.

I CAN ACCEPT SOME FLATFOOT CHOSING TO BLIND EMSELF
BUT..THEN AGAIN..THE..father of a flat foot must have the same genes

mate..i wish/things wewre clearly/good/bad
but its not..every story has two sides
most are like jon ..at the other thread..they want simply whats best

but if you know a problem..coppers are morally bound to report it
even iF ITS YA DAUGHTER OR HER FATHER..COPS must do it

thus they come here..say we dont report nuthin[because we never read his posts]

but clearly by replying you have..OK THAT APPLIES TO CHRIS[WHO I WILL BE SUMMONSING INTO COURT/dPP THIS IS MY OFFICIAL NOTICE..to you/lot

but you ismise never [maybe-never]..certainly havnt..declared/publicly/to me..that you took the oath
unless your daughter is following the same carreeer path

THING IS ITS CRIMINAL/high treason..the things im exposing
and with all the watchers/police/informants etc at all levels

simply saying
'i seen nuthin'..thus what they reply reveals much/but mean nuthin.

just deliberated/corroborated/verified willful
chosen self censure..;..ignorance*

AND THATS HOW A LOYALIST SERVERS..HRH.. HIS OATH..?
beyond sad..or disappointing..its officially malfeasance*
[i KNOW..CHRIS..THATS A BIG WORD..but ask issie to explain.]
IN ORWELLIAN DOUBLE SPEAK..IN TRIPLICATE..ON THE RIGHT FORM..ASP/QED.RSVP/VIP...Rip.

Thank you for the responses.

The central argument of the anti-vaccinators is that mortality rates have dropped mainly due to increased hygiene and disease awareness.

They also point to years where deaths through vaccination are higher than the incidence of the disease.

Here is an interesting report form the early years of the polio vaccine. One point I found pertinent was the following;

“The success of diphtheria vaccine is dependent in part on its ability to decrease the number of healthy carriers of that germ. If a virulent diphtheria germ enters the throat of an immunized child, it is not so likely to live and grow as it would if the child were not immune. A vaccination program in diphtheria protects the vaccinated child and decreases the number of carriers in the community, thereby decreasing the number of children infected by coming in contact with such carriers. Vaccinating a child against diphtheria thus not only protects him but also to a certain extent protects nonimmune children in the same community by cutting down their exposure to the germ. When polio occurs, many of those who are in close contact with the patient—his family and his friends—become carriers of virulent polio virus in their gastrointestinal tracts. Such carriers probably play an important role in the transmission of this disease. It was hoped that polio vaccination would decrease the number of such healthy carriers and thus interfere with the transmission of the disease. Unfortunately, evidence being accumulated in four different laboratories indicates that it does not. All the evidence collected so far indicates that children immunized with polio vaccine are as likely to carry the living polio virus as are unvaccinated children. Polio vaccination, then, unlike diphtheria vaccination, can only protect the vaccinated person. Therefore, even if polio vaccination were 100 per cent effective, every person would have to be vaccinated in order to control the disease completely.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1957/02/how-good-is-the-polio-vaccine/303946/

cont...

Cont...

My discussion with the anti-vaccine nurse was instructive in that when I asked her if she would would be happy for her adult children to visit India or Pakistan un-vaccinated she retreated a little and said as long as her children were aware and informed of the risks of vaccinations then she was okay. Why is it that the target seems to be the triple shot given to children who are not able to appraise themselves of the relevant information nor make a decision for themselves?

It does indeed seem selfish.

Another point she raised was about the increases in ADHD which she directly attributed to childhood vaccines.

However this story released today shows just how much her factors are at play.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-02-25/adhd-link-to-paracetamol-use-during-pregnancy/5284044