yes..is mise..i have seen pictures
did you know..that small pox HAS HAD THOUSANDS OF EVOLUTIONS?
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=small+pox+evolution&

the biggest danger is medicine treating everyONE AS IF WE WERE THE RUNT OF THE LITTER[OF COURSE ITS NOT SURPRISING..IN ITSELF AS WE DIDNT COME FROM APES AS MUCH AS PIGS/YET ANOTHER LIE SCIENCE HASNT GOTTEN ROUND TO EXPLAINING.

the same science lies/to THEIR FAITHFUL/VICTIMS.

GO TO
http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins-2.html
LOOK AT THE..LIGHT GREEN BOX..PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY..
THE WHY..of..THE NEW/INTRODUCED BY PIG HYBRID..REQUIRED DIFFERENT ALIGNMENT PARAMETERS?..[see under]

<..Changing the rules..so a different result emerges?>>

SCIENCE CLAIMS..ITS STRENGTH..IS IT ADAPTS..as the facts adapt
but clearly...those not wanting to know..hate how facts reveal they only had faith..

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-chimp-pig-hybrid-humans.html

YEt..the pig has all of eM*..[HOW DID WE 'EVOLVE'..THEM..IN A MERE 100,000 YEARS..yet..[APES..UNCHANGED FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS.]

Looking at a subset..of the listed traits,..it's clear that the other parent..in this hypothetical cross..that produced the first human would be an intelligent animal..with a protrusive,..cartilaginous nose,..a thick layer..of subcutaneous fat,.short digits,..and a naked skin.

It would be terrestrial,..not arboreal,..and adaptable to a wide range of foods..and environments...These traits may bring a particular creature to mind...

In fact,..a particular non-primate does have,..not only each of the few traits..just mentioned,..but every one of the many traits..listed in the sidebar..

[IE..OUR GRANDMA...GRANPA].
ready..to name names?..

FORGET TAXONOMY/..ITS REFUTED/turns out
the same..'TAXONOMIC'..features evolved..via many MUTATIONS/many GENE-RECOMBINATION.S

god..did not place pigs..and humans..in different taxonomic/orders. Taxonomists did...A great deal of evidence..(read a discussion of this topic)..exists to suggest..that taxonomists are,..in no way, infallible.

http://www.macroevolution.net/dubious-assumptions.html
Our ideas..concerning the proper categorization..of animals are shaped..by bias and tradition..to such an extent..that it would be rash to reject,..[solely on taxonomic grounds,]..the feasibility of such a cross.
http://www.macroevolution.net/hybrid-hypothesis-section-6.html

Chriss,

A few drams o' Glenfiddich helps but the dose must be repeated at frequent intervals.

OUG,

I didn't ask about pictures, so we can take it that you've never seen a smallpox victim; figures.

ISMISE..HAS SEEN/..WITH HIS OWN EYES

YET IGNORES..new..LEARNING

There are side effects and risks associated with the smallpox vaccine. In the past, about 1 out of 1,000 people vaccinated for the first time experienced serious, but non-life-threatening, reactions including toxic or allergic reaction at the site of the vaccination (erythema multiforme), spread of the vaccinia virus to other parts of the body, and to other individuals.

Potentially life-threatening reactions occurred in 14 to 500 people out of every 1 million people vaccinated for the first time. Based on past experience, it is estimated that 1 or 2 people in 1 million (0.000198%) who receive the vaccine may die as a result, most often the result of postvaccinial encephalitis or severe necrosis in the area of vaccination (called progressive vaccinia).[38]

Given these risks, as smallpox became effectively eradicated and the number of naturally occurring cases fell below the number of vaccine-induced illnesses and deaths, routine childhood vaccination was discontinued in the United States in 1972, and was abandoned in most European countries in the early 1970s

so you saw it early 70.s

great im impressed/but you didnt get it..[get it?]

SO WATCH-OUT MATE
[ITS GOING TO GET YA/now...BOOGY BOOGILY BOO]
its coming to get you

<<..] Age distribution of smallpox infections depends on acquired immunity. Vaccination immunity declines over time and is probably lost in all but the most recently vaccinated populations>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallpox

n addition, a form called variola sine eruptione
(smallpox without rash)..was seen generally,ONLY..in vaccinated persons.

OUG,

Actually I saw smallpox in the 1950s and I was very thankful that I'd been vaccinated and thanks for those encouraging figures that prove the efficacy of the smallpox vaccine.

I think that whatever drives this movement, it is still up to the parents if they will trust the medical society and have their child vaccinated. People have their own beliefs and point of view, I as a parent also heard of this Autism related issues linked to triple vaccination shots, however, the pediatrician assured me that this is not proven, besides, all our family members took the shot and they're all good. I would have to trust my baby's pediatrician on this.