csteele's lesson is obviously that countries who accept migrants must always be diligent in screening them.

The drunken Czech–born Petra Mills who kicks English Bobbies in the shins, engages in domestic affrays with her spouse and says rude things to neighbours is not the sort of person one would invite home for tea. London to a brick she is also on welfare.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/9693082/Guilty-of-racism-the-woman-who-called-a-Kiwi-a-fat-Aussie.html

It is worse of course where violent SOBs who will not accept our laws are imported, but some are. What to do about that is the question.

csteele - To quote you "However of late I am of a mind to challenge this type of thinking head on."

I like your tactic for challenging something "head on" by refusing to answer any questions you are asked.

Dear Philip S,

My apologies.

After a number days and half a dozen posts without a question from you to answer as I had promised, you finally did indeed ask me one that to be perfectly honest nearly slipped me by.

And congratulations to you, it wasn't one loaded with poison as I had thought it might be.

You asked;

“csteele - So what is your point?”

Why point was to cheer Lexi up with a post that told of the term 'Australian' being deemed to be offensive. I found it amusing and I hoped she did too.

End of story.

csteele - Typical you failed to answer the hard questions, I will reiterate what I previously said before "Having a discussion with you is like talking to a brick wall".

To anyone reading this thread from the start you have lost any credibility, you have simply avoided many questions asked by various people.

Philip s have I missed it?
I asked for evidence 85% remain on welfare 5 years after they arrive.
Now lets not get too far away from my thoughts, not what you think I think.
I think Muslim migration, is an unwanted danger to my country.
Not because all Muslims are a danger, but the exclusiveness of most.
The radicalism of many, the demands of the faith, are un-Australian, and not comparable with western life styles.
But you, and Rechtub, use it only takes, as a reason to exclude the whole.
It only takes!
Do you understand we, almost certainly have more than four would be terrorists who are WASP here now?
I am solidly against the migration of these hard liners.
But remember the lie, a shop would not sell was it Anzac biscuits?
I fancy no evidence can be found to support you claims.
And that mate is providing me evidence of your extremist views.

Mr C Steele talks about "poison peddling" and how such "peddlers" should be held accountable. They ARE held accountable in the court of public opinion. Personally, I think it is better that these views be exposed to the hard light of day, and not allowed to fester in secret. Therefore I support free speech, even that of people who promulgate detestable ideas. As for the "social media" rant that brought this to Mr Steele's attention, it was that of an obviously ill-educated person, who was reacting on a purely emotional level. I do think the reaction was extreme, but unfortunately the nature of Islam does tend to provoke that kind of emotional reaction, in both its followers and its opponents. These emotional reactions lead to all sorts of bloody consequences, which are regularly reported.
I hope and assume that Mr Steele would not agree with the sentiments espoused by the Imam of the Grand Mosque of Mecca. This article is from the Australian, I reproduce it in full because it is behind a pay wall