Dear Jayb,

Lexi has kindly spoken about my objectiveness for which I thank her.

Yet I acknowledge a degree of subjectiveness with which I have approached this thread.

I feel that 'exercising scrupulous caution' in an 'attempt to be as objective as possible' is probably been beyond me on this issue. It is why I have chosen to ignore those who wish to engage purely to further promote their poison. However watching you spiral into hysterics and stain your credibility with others has not been edifying and I am feeling a little guilty.

I will answer any three questions you now put to me and will attempt to be as objective as possible even if they are poison promoting.

csteele - I like your new approach if you don't like a question you call it "poison" thereby giving you in your mind the right to ignore it.

Just like I said before like talking to a brick wall.

csteel: I will answer any three questions you now put to me and will attempt to be as objective as possible even if they are poison promoting.

I don't see how you would consider these three questions as poison promoting. There is no need to be objective or deflective either. They are just 3 simple questions that only require a only a simple "Yes" or "No." I'm sure that is all that anyone on this forum would require to any question asked of you.

With that said. Here are my 3 questions;

1. Do you believe in the Qur’an as the only holy book?

2. Do you want Sharia Law to become the Law in Australia at some time in the future?

3. Do you want, or like to see, Australia to become an Islamic Caliphate at some time in the future?

The questions are simple, straightforward, to the point. There is no trickery or poison involved. You only have to answer, “yes” or "No" to them. There is no reason for you to deflect the questions with meaningless prattle on a different topic, as is your usual manner.

I've left room for a simple "cut & Paste" to make it easy for you. Just a simple "Yes" or "No," is all that is required. Thank you.

Dear Jayb,

1. No
2. No
3. No

And I thank you for moderating the tone of your questions.

Dear Philip S,

Do you beat your wife?

Csteel has answered my questions at last. Her answers are as follows:

1. Do you believe in the Qur’an?
"No"

2. Do you want Sharia Law in Australia?
"No"

3. Do you want Australia to become an Islamic Caliphate?
"No"

As for his question to Phillip S. I do believe the question should be;

"Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" Isn't that how it goes. ;-)

Logic Questions 101. #6.

Dear Mr Steele

Thank you for your response. You are right, new migrants will provide us with challenges. However I do feel that for some nationalities, integration and assimilation into the Australian way of life is much more difficult than for others.
Culture and religion can be insurmountable obstacles to successful integration. For example, I refer you to the 2005 London underground train bombings (plus one bus) in which 52 civilians died and seven hundred were injured. The perpetrators were four young Muslim men who were born in England. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_July_2005_London_bombings

These young men, even though born in England, were not integrated at all. In other words, their religion and culture came first in their minds.

I don't attribute the problems we are having with Islam only to the Saudis, as you do. This friction occurs all over the world wherever there are significant Muslim populations living in close proximity to non-Muslims. In addition, it has been going on for a very long time.

I do believe that the West needs to severely limit Muslim immigration.