The Forum > General Discussion > Islamic riot
Islamic riot
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Page 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- ...
- 103
- 104
- 105
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
So when we find you handing out copies of The Elders of Zion saying to the pundits "I don't really know how true the following is..." you don't deserve to be challenged?
Get real.
You had one of two choices here. You could have acknowledge what you posted was blatantly incorrect and apologised or you could decide to admit nothing and go on the attack.
You chose the latter and responded with “It's a view shared by most Australians. However, not a view shared by, Muslims, the Academia, Loony Greenie, & the Anti-Social PC crowd. They are unAustralian anyway. So I don't really give a R@T$ @r$3. Build a bridge.”
There are some lines on this site you really should not cross. When the rest of us engage you in debate it is with the general assumption any evidence you are posting has a degree of veracity. The rubbish you posted served to remove that assumption. The only real remedy was an apology and a commitment to be more careful in the future. As these have not been forthcoming you then become the type of poster that is not worth the effort.
I now recall you have previous form with this kind of thing.
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=5123&page=0#138110
The common theme would seem to be snopes.com, it really is time to give that rubbish up.
Once was bad enough, this second effort has effectively labelled you as an untrustworthy, serial offender. Not a good look