im yet to hear the science
think of it a bit less hysterically

c02...is one carbon
with two oxygen

water is h20
now h is hydrogen..[2]
oxygen one

how better than to put c02
[or rather the 0...for the water...up in the sky]

we say rainfall has slowed
but as chibna gears up it suddenly has increased
AS THEIR C02 INCREASED...a few years lag..we get rain*

think about it
when more effective western methods cleaned up the 'polution'
of the skies..less carbon...[and thus less oxygen]..to make it rain
[was released..thus reduced rain/droudt..etc...[cause of the ozone hole?]

recall thatcher started this
when she said the earth was going to cool
when the earth got hotter..[less clouds/smoke..allowing more heat]
it then became lets tax carbon..cause its heating...

then when that was refuted...
it became change....

[add in the spin/buzzword climate...[lol]..
it became..

c-lie/mate change]

its only china...hitting its big carbon peak
thats bringing back the rain

so we make less c02
our farmers go back into droudt
our damms get empty

we need more co2 than kyoto
not less c02...as this lie is currently doing

we ned a balance
the ignorance has spread too far

if we can handle the rain
maybe the co2 level..of 2009
is the true limit

but sciebnce has gone into shame/blame
legislate /trade mode
and the decieved
have gone deaf

bring it on

we have to stop china poluting*
to bring back the droudt*

Deat Individual,

You have to admire academics.
They hide their lack of talent so well.
Unlike some people who don't have one
single redeeming defect.

Unlike some people who don't have one
single redeeming defect.
Lexi,
My sympathy. Don't give up yet.

OUG sorry you can no longer expect me to read or respond to your posts,get well.
Individual we have been here before.
I do not agree with you.
Yes you stir, and yes I can not spell, have little idea of sentence composure.
Not idea of grammar.
But if this is a swimming pool you seem to be trying to do a triple somersault from the low board at the shallow end of the pool.
And to have done so often.
If you research, just in this thread look at your post before the BBQ sarcasm of mine.
Now see your all knowing all encompassing slur? you know its aim was to fire me up don't you.
I did well to use humor and the lowest form at that.
Your view every Labor voter is a lessor being weary me.
The slanted nature spotlighting Labors faults , but refusing to contemplate Abbott's failures too.
If you cast your bait over the waters you must in time expect it will be bitten off.
Did you look, at those ten posts? good now read the last ten of OUG and tell me what its all about.

Belly,
A couple of things here. Tony Abbott's failures ? I didn't know he was already elected ?
Regarding OUG, I don't read those posts because I lose concentration trying to get the gist.
What exactly is slanted about pointing out a political parties failed policies, especially when I am personally affected by them ? My view about Labor voters is that I hardly know a single one who is not selfish & opportunistic. I would be one of the most vehement labor supporters if Labor were Labor. Sadly, in my view they've become nothing but a self-serving academic yuppie club supported by people who are not much better of character. If you want me to give a more positive opinion then ask them to lift their game rather than just tax us into the ground to pay for their failed policies.

Dear Individual,

I won't give up on people - especially one's who think they
know everything. That points clearly to a political career.