god bless osmosis

individual/quote..""I am not at all out to defame anyone,
I'm merely encouraging them do it themselves...""

i tend to agree
and belly should know im angry at his party
NOT him*

its them i call larats
not you..but now i said that 3 times allready
[and considering individuals 'osmosis'..and sadiomasic minester's statements.,..opposing your's..with inverse affect]..well enough said

the issue continues...lexies statements..mainly indiate dissatisFACTION..with sm...on the grounds of tonies stand
[tony is a phoney lexie..but so too..[worse]..is juliar.

its her bringing in the wrong solution
to the wrong problem..

but as you claim to be one of the group..
its futile to write it again

BIG BUSINESS..isnt paying the tax...!
the midle income workers will be paying it to the 1000
who then pass on the money...first to govt..then to the bank

to say ONLY ONE THOUSAND WILL PAY..is a lie..!
we ALL shall be paying..SOME will get cash back..others will loose cash

BUT WE ARE ALL PAYING*

i presented basic science
that rebuts us causing the climate
we are subject to a huge fire in the sky
that heats us during the day

AT nmight...that cools ...about ten degrees
if night is longer..it gets so cold..we get ice
or so warm as to slow cook an egg...the climate also varies..according to how far from the fi8re in the sky we are
[the orbit is oval shape...hus when we are further..we get cooling trends

and closer we get warming

to any who think
light a fire..at night
it rises up into the sky
till the freezer...[outer space]..cools it down

se hot air rises
cold air falls
thus ice on mountain tops

the tax does nothing
but take from you..to give to others

just like the guilty
with day time heat trapping thingies..[solar sells]
on their roof...bought /paid for by govt...

who in blinding them
got their loyalty..cause they drank the cool-aid
let them pay the new tax..i couldnt care less
but if any read they heard me say that often

In fact he wants us to pay them.Lexi,
There is no fairer system than user pays. We, the consumers are the users. As a consumer all we have to do is ask for less & the polluting will lessen. Any village idiot can grasp that concept. If only the intellectuals could rise to the common sense of a village idiot, we'd be ok.

OUG...You truly are a strange individual indeed. I found this clip from you tube and I was wondering if you could translate the text for [me].

god bless osmosis

individual/quote..""I am not at all out to defame anyone,
I'm merely encouraging them do it themselves...""
Ezekiel 25:17

"The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the iniquities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who in the name of charity and goodwill shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ujm9BLzaaBo&feature=related

I don't like your god very much, he seems like Violent man words to me:)

If the human race waits for God to show us the way.....it will too late. Think! OUG 7 billion people then 8 then 9 billion....and the earth is going to be all better, isn't it......OUG you cant be that foolish.

LEA

Dear Individual,

Tony Abbott is the Mark Latham of the Libs - and eventually he will end up the same way (a fireball of crazy - when he doesn't get to be PM).

The whole point is - not that you use and you pay - but that you eliminate pollution. You give polluters incentives to find alternative means of producing cleaner energy. Without taxing the polluters there is no incentive for them to seek alternative technology. And believing that the user should pay only encourages the polluters to maintain the status quo. By putting a price on carbon pollution we ensure the big polluters pay for the pollution they release into our air. By taking action we can build a clean energy future based on renewable energy like wind and solar. BTW - the Coalition's so called "Direction Action scheme has a $30 billion budget black hole. This means the Coalition would need to spend additional tax payer dollars to purchase 75% of the required abatement from overseas at a cost of over $20 billion and they want us to foot this bill. So Tony Abbott's arguing about the so called "carbon tax," can't be taken seriously because what he's offering will end up costing the taxpayer much more over a longer period of time. The Coalition would also repeal any proposed tax cuts linked with the carbon tax if elected.

Obviously the Opposition leader has decided to maximise his advantage on "economic management" by invoking the glorious "Howard Age," and avoid commiting himself to anything substantive on economic policy in the here and now. As a public tactic this is clearly designed to keep the focus on the government and to change the subject without addressing the questions posed about savings as well as to of course maintain the constant election frenzy that Abbott likes to conjure up. You don't necessarily have to be any sort of
"intellectual" to not buy into this vacuous rhetoric. You simply have to not belong to the bunch of greedy-bloody-minded, ethically bankrupt
sheep that historians will view the Australian people circa 2011.

and closer we get warming

to any who think
light a fire..at night
it rises up into the sky
till the freezer...[outer space]..cools it down

And yes, that's normally true, however its happening at such a faster rate.......sensitive life forms are dieing, and in the last century alone, has been the fastest extinction rate ever recorded in the history of the planet.......care to explain?

And humans have nothing to do with it...lol.....go and pray. Iam sure only the righteous one's will benefit.

Your cycles usually takes millions of years, not with-in a hundred.

I too will lay down my vengence for the helpless creatures of this earth so saith me the lord:) See! OUG the bible can be interpersonal with-out being religious.

LEA

Lexi,
I'm afraid I see your reply as shirking responsibility. You say the producer should look for cleaner alternatives. I say make the consumer look for sources which use cleaner methods of production. You can not & shall not expect others to find solutions for problems which are there purely on your behalf. You want, you pay & do your bit. No Multinational outfit will continue for a day longer if the consumers stop frequenting their outlets. The consumer is the cause of pollution. Without the consumer you have no producer. No producer no pollution. So far as your budget projections are concerned , they're merely meaningless speculation. You want to reduce pollution then stop breeding, demanding & using. Don't blame your supplier, blame yourself.