The Forum > General Discussion > Child porn, paedophilia, gay bars, corruption, and the Labor party.
Child porn, paedophilia, gay bars, corruption, and the Labor party.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- ...
- 20
- 21
- 22
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Belly, maaaate, I wouldn't have so much as been able to get near a cashier's window in this TAB to get any money on if I wanted to, due to all the hysterical over-reaction to what most who have posted claim to be a known 'wind up' poster, one who has confessed to being such within this very thread. It seems but mention the words 'child porn' or 'paedophilia' in any context, and the ability or will to read what is actually posted goes straight out the window, let alone any ability to rationally discuss any such issues to the extent that they may become to be shown to be relevant. I think some interests exploit this 'irrationality reflex' in both political debate and international diplomacy.
Let me be clear: I was not suggesting that Ammonite was trying to close down the OLO site. That was something seemingly attempted, between them, by Gregory Storer and 'Mikey Bear' over the publication by OLO of the Muehlenberg article last November. What Ammonite (endorsed by Morganzola) in this thread was opening up was the same sort of challenge to moderation as was used in the attempt, in relation to the Muehlenberg article, to divert attention away from what had been an attempt to prevent publication of certain sorts of articles and/or authors on OLO by attacking the revenue of the site.
What has to be remembered is that what has been over-reacted to here is an opening post and topic title, and as such is something that has been the subject of specific moderation approval before even going up on the discussions index page. It is not a post that has 'flown under the radar'. This site does not need a re-emergence of the challenges to moderation that were occurring a few months ago. I was, and am, simply trying to help nip any such re-emergence in the bud.
Some more MSM background on the current matter:
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/labor-factional-heavies-spark-panic/story-fn2sdwup-1226043105835
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/backroom-mp-bernard-finnigans-rapid-rise-and-fall/story-fn2sdwup-1226043111535
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/in-depth/rann-defiant-as-alp-counts/story-fn2sdwup-1226043844368
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/state-politics/rann-caucus-mulls-replacement-for-finnigan/story-e6frgczx-1226043513529