davidian in a battle of witz...quote<<“When and if science does create life,..how will that fit with your ‘theology’?”>>>your making inferances...in lue of replying the four questions

will repeat my challange from
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=9564#154420

please reply..the 3 questions...lol..
with your..knowledge/science

..if you really got..a science..
give me...a genus/evolution-tree...[not species]

2.give me the name..of that first living thing..

..that evolved...as even science..dare not go this far...simplify...was this first...'life'...in salt water or fresh

3.validate a SINGLE EGSAMPLE...OF GENUS EVOLVING INTO OTHER GENUS...again..this is an impossability...

ANSWER
..THE QUESTION..using science..

...was this first...'life'...in salt water or fresh

3.validate a SINGLE EGSAMPLE...OF GENUS EVOLVING...as no such event..has ever been reported/..nor observed..

it's concept..[evolution..is thus revealed illusion/theory..not knowledge...not science

ANSWER..THE QUESTION's..
..using science..REPLICATE

make ...just one like it...FIRST
if science..REPLICATE IT...LOL

if not science...dont pretend it is

<<No answer supplied,..not even in the hypothetical...Demonstrates closed mind>>>lol.

“Sensible answer would be nice..but not expected.”

And,..therefore,..lol...yet again..I wasn’t disappointed.

the davidian...yet again...lol..Demonstrates
athiest ignorance/redirection/bluster..is preferable to honesty.

but i will accept..his distraction YET AGAIN..and give a FURTHER reply...yet again...

ya ready retard...when..or if science...does create life...it will be by fraud and deception...

as i replied you last post..simply speaking its not going to happen...when it does..then you can say i told you so...but its not even a real possability..for reasons as i previously wrote..they cant even name,..this beasties genus...lol..

and if by chance they do..big deal..
god used his own dust..GOD thunk it first

yOU is..a lying retaRD..david/BRO

I REPLIED YA TWICE...
....YOU HAVNT REPLIED EVEN ONCE

oug,

You seem quite prepared to hypothesise that a god exists, without ever producing evidence.

All I am asking you to do, politely, you will notice, is to do the same about if science were to create life.

That you won't, therefore exposes your special pleading.

David

neat destraction oh liver..lol

lol..ya link played the maxwell house advert..two bloody time's
..then freezes the vidio...ya retard

so i searched out other links
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=sperm+and+eggs+from+stem+cells.+&search_type=&aq=f

your possably..more interested in this vid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Tt8ncDFjkg
but yet agsain...lol..it refuses to play

so i will quote from the blurb...

<<The Newcastle University work centres on stem cells - 'blank' cells with...the ability..to turn into other cell types>>..ie cells god ALLREADY MADE.

<<Biologist Karim Nayernia..created a cocktail of chemicals and vitamins...that turned human stem cells>>>lol..<<..into sperm,..the journal Stem Cells and Development reports today.>>

<<Viewed through a microscope,..they have heads and tails..and swim like normal sperm,..>>yeah just like a horse and a donkey create an infertile MULE...lol...ya jackarse

<<and Professor Nayernia is 'convinced'..>>>lol..how convincing...lol...<<CON-vinced..they would be capable of fertilising eggs and creating babies>>>..lol eggs only god can make..in a woumb god built/designed.

lol..ya retard..<<He has more safety checks..to carry out..but plans to apply for permission..to use some of the..artificial sperm to fertilise eggs...for research purposes>>..ya might check out the other links the searc h turned up...lol.

..they are turning t cells into sperm..[not proper sperm...because of mitosis..t cells havnt under gone...Meiosis is the type of cell division..that creates egg and sperm cells. Mitosis is a fundamental process for life.

<<Meiosis is how our body makes sex cells,..or gametes..(eggs or sperm)>>lol get it ya retard..t-cell=full dna/compliment..not half..get it ya retard...its spin...as usual.

http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=gd&q=sperm+mitosisis&hl=en-GB&rls=MEDA,MEDA:2008-36,MEDA:en-GB

i really wish..you retards..would do ya homework
ya'all..looking so ignorant..

of the even the basics..of athiesm...lol

ie..being able to be rebutting..of..gods
self evident proofs...lol

OUG,

1. Your "retard" comments are not appreciated. I thought OLO had rules about this sort of behaviour. If you keep this up, I doubt people will engage with you.

2. Why did Yahweh take an entire rib? Why not just a single cell?

3. Today's efforts are a "first step". Creating a cell without a cell will happen. Consider: It is less than a century between Kitty Hawk and The Space Shuttle.

4. Genesis says God created "plants", "trees" and "living creators" and various celestial bodies. Hebrew scripture does not say how or with what. There is no claim that fundamental particles or cells did not already exist. Where does Genesis say God created the four fundamental forces in nature (our universe at least)required to achieve an evolved solar system and species? I

5. The Babylonians had Gods existing before the Creation and before the Hebrew scriptures were written.

Also, was Moses a plagiarist and Yahweh a copy-cat? I refer to the Enuma Elish which predates Hebrew scripture.

6. Was Zeus justified in punishing the Titans?

oh liver quote..<<1...Your "retard"..comments>>..you claim your disbelief...via science...

..your clear lack of ability..to present the science..leads one to think...either you dont know...or are too stupid to know...clearly your NOT/too stupid..thus seem reluctsant to reveal the simple truth..ya dont know

<<I doubt people will engage with you>>>its not my fault..you lot..dont know the science you make claim to...but as your clearly not bothered by not knowing..forgive my infering...your incapable of the study/knowiung..or comprehending..[that you dont know

as you ask questions..about distractions..<<Why did Yahweh>><<Was Zeus>><<take an entire rib>>.i suggest you get on ya knees..and ask him...

your retardeness..fails to comprehend..my questions..and fails to reply mine..yet i reply all of yours..clearly there is an inherant choice of selective/ignorance...

loll while claiming science..
when its all beyond your ken

you prattle on about..<<"first step">>.yet cant name the first life...lol

....yopu talk of..<<Creating a cell>>.yet use a T_CELL...lol..to do it...lol..yet fail to see the absurdity of changing..AN EGSISTENT CELL

Consider:..YOUR THEORY IS 200/YEARS OLD..and you lot still got no abiogensus/..no evolution of genus..still got an ever changing theory

<<Genesis says God created>>>but science claims science>>yet you who disbelieve...cant state ya science...your proof consists of us confirming our's...lol..but we dont claim science..we claim belief..mindfull belief..whereas you lot claim scietific disbelief..get it...lol..ya advanced athiest you

<<no claim that fundamental particles..or cells did not already exist>>>no we dont..but you non-retards do...lol...see the absurdity...we have a definite beginning,..you got branches..you think are/trees

..you lot...LOL..claiming science...

BUT..CANNOT produce..your first life/...nor what first evolved from what../nor any evolution of ANY/genus...how insane is that?

will repeat my challange from

http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?article=9564#154420

please reply..the 3 questions...lol..
with your..knowledge/science

..if you really got..a science..
give me...a genus/evolution-tree...[not species]

2.give me the name..of that first living thing..

..that evolved...as even science..dare not go this far...simplify...was this first...'life'...in salt water or fresh

3.validate a SINGLE EGSAMPLE...OF GENUS EVOLVING INTO OTHER GENUS...again..this is an impossability...

please try to answer..with science..

Pericles, if you read my post, it WAS reported, and the reply directly to this was what I posted, that basically schools and teachers so long as they covered the curriculum, were able to teach as they saw fit in regard their community etc. That was a direct question regarding creationism being taught in science classes in QLD, you are ignoring the context of the whole contact, and saying 'but it could just be generally about stuff kinda ..' It's not, whole slabs of issues have put forward to Education Queensland, and there's really no decent response to it at all.

It was a direct question, from the Secular lobby, and that was a reply, I included names. Other than that, I'm not about to engage in it with little old you on some 350 word forum on the internet just to appease your need to go on the attack.

But to answer your kinda question regarding how EQ responds, this stuff HAS been raised, and continually ignored. An example is :

http://www.brisinst.org.au/past-issue-details.php?article_id=521