Foxy belly
Rudd has spent 500 million dollars of public funds to engage advise outside of his own advisors. You wanted to talkabout the budget.
Ok lets take a look at some facts.
The funds borrowed would be much better off as I said before going into inflastructre throughout the states and to create jobs fix up the barbaric conditions conditions our chicken and pork plants operate under.
There is overwheliming evidence forrest available , to illustrate the complex web of ecomic benefits to processing meat in Australia.

With its potential contribition to vaule adding and emloyment far outweighing the contribution of the small areas Rudd has aimed towards.
Also the facts are his last spend up was not succesful as was warned by the libs. Figures show most people saved the money.

Given the fact we have Maylasia destined to be the hub of a 3 Trillion dollar industry which much of that raw material being scauced from Australia - Rudd need to put funds into reopening plant as a matter of urgency.
I make no apoligies for also raising the facts of the other reasons for doing this. To fix the dreadful conditions operating through Governments towards farm Animals as they stand at the moment.

I also said earler somewhere that some of the funds should go to putting in pipes from QLD to flush out the Murry.
BHP have stood staff down together with Rio. Very easy for Mr Rudd to get this stred. Low outlay considering they already have the equiptment.
That way they could put the staff back on they have had to let go.

Now that Mr Rudd would create employment and inflastrure at very little cost within days.

oh and that didnt cost you 500 million dollars of the publics money Mr Rud

Nicky continued
If the chronology on my last post seems off, it is because I wanted to come to Australia in the mid 1970’s but I had then recently married and Whitlam closed the open migration option.. so I ended up waiting in queue and got here in 1983 when the Liberals were in power.

By 1983 Margaret Thatcher was in her stride, she had the Falklands behind her… literally destroying the Argentinean military capability and their squalid attempt at illegal occupation of those islands

and the UK labour opposition party were left, whining like stuck pigs, because they thought the Falklands should be left to the United Nations…

but ultimately the British electorate voted the Conservatives back with a massive majority, so regardless of all the outcries of the leftie swill, Thatcher was right.

Of course, just previous, Whitlam, had behaved like a cowardly creep and an Indonesian sycophant as well as the worst political leader Australia has ever seen, although closely followed by Keating, one of his wet-wipes, neither of whom ever rose above knee high to Margaret Thatcher (she could have crushed them both with a single blow from her handbag).

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/whitlams-east-timor-policies-chilling/2007/05/17/1178995295462.html

but ultimately, Nicky, myself and millions of others, did not decide on where to live based solely on the politics (or I would have probably settled in a Republican USA). We each use a wide range of criteria.

Of course the recurring boot-in from Examinator with such comments as

“If longevity is the measure how long was Stalin at the head of USSR?”

The difference, which our other moron fails to accept, Thatcher was democratically elected, Stalin was not.. but such subtlety is completely missed by our obtuse “Examinator” of all things.

I will return

Someone needs to keep the facts straight and stop the leftie revisionist swill maligning people they are not fit to crawl in the shadow of.

Thanks to everyone for contributing to this
thread.

It will be interesting to see whether the Government's
package will produce at least some of the results that the
Government is hoping to achieve.

The future of the Liberal Party will also be one
that should be interesting to watch.

All The Best to You All,

You are a worry Gerturde, you really are.

Here you are on OLO preaching Gertrudanomics, which seems
to make sense to nobody but you lol, meantime I read on
Farmonline that up to 150'000 cattle have died and are
starving in your state, due to flooding and no food.

Given your constant claims of loving animals, why
arn't you up there helping to feed them?

cont'd

Dennis Pryor summed up politics rather well
in his booklet, "Political Pryorities." :

"The law of obfuscation or 'that wasn't
what I said.' All political statements,
whether by Government or Opposition,
must be worded so that the opposite
meaning can be extracted from them.
The hidden agenda of such a simple
statement as ' we shall abolish poverty'
or 'we shall create jobs' reads as follows"
'We shall abolish poverty or create jobs
sometime in the future, subject to the state
of the economy. If the Senate lets us, if we
haven't got more important things to do,
if it suits the international bankers and if
there is no more important measure to win the
next election.'

Politics - you gotta love it!

You too yabby are wasting your time, no matter how well you express it it will fall on deaf ears.
That China thread!
The carcase has been dragged from thread to thread so many times, and I still do not know what it is about.
Yes a few times, I took offense at posts.
I have no intention of letting it get to me again.
Yes sock puppets spam, such I will report but not a poster, after all some posts are best left for all to see.