Trumpster,

You didn't address the facts of the WORKING CLASS war dead, or the TRUMP THE COWARD facts I put to you, have you done a runner?

As for killing innocent non combatants in war, its morally and legally wrong. There is no justification for doing so, unfortunately civilians are often the biggest number of casualties in war, as we see in Gaza where the Zionist regime have murdered 70,000 innocent people. Non of that action is justification for payback for Hamas killing 1200 innocent Israelis.

Why are you and others on this forum so callous towards innocent people dying in wars, in huge numbers, children with their heads blown off etc. I suppose you are insulated from it all, and don't give a rats. It don't effect you, other than you have to pay an extra dollar for petrol, big deal, what a small price you pay. Trump sickens me as he gloats over killing so many people.

You didn't address the facts of the WORKING CLASS war dead, or the TRUMP THE COWARD facts I put to you"

Oh you thought your unsupported assertions were facts. That's so cute.

After saying that blacks and Hispanics died in greater numbers, I provided the actual numbers and you immediately changed the subject to your unsupported assertions. Want to know why more working class white kids died in Vietnam than rich kids? Because proportionally there were many more working class kids in the population in those times. To prove your assertions you'd need to show that the deaths of poor white kids were out of proportion to their numbers in the general populations. Like I did with the blacks and Hispanics that made you drop that subject.

"Are you seriously arguing that people weren't dying in the war and that bringing it to an early end didn't save those people. People who were dying in Changi. People who were dying in Shanghai. People who were dying in the daily US air-raids using conventional bombs. Are you seriously saying those things weren't happening."

Iran war live updates: Iran threatens to retaliate if US orders ground operation
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-30/iran-war-live-updates-us-ground-operation/106509210#live-blog-post-278037

What sort of a stupid headline is this?

'Iran threatens..'
- Does it need to be written so that it sounds like Iran is the one causing trouble?

'Iran threatens to Punch Back, If Punched'.

It's almost as bad as Trump a few weeks back after they killed the Ayatolloh.

Based on reports from March 2026, President Trump described Iran’s retaliation against U.S.-Israeli strikes as "a little unfair" and claimed they had "no right to be doing what they are doing"
. He noted that the U.S. and Israel were hitting Iran 'very hard' and considered it unfair that Iran was fighting back.

Or like this:

“Does the world expect us to be well-behaved victims while we’re being killed?” — Yahya Sinwar
http://x.com/WarFrontIntel/status/2038186189308690626

Or Trump a day or so back...

Trump: "I don't think it was very risky."
http://x.com/FurkanGozukara/status/2037671132275376138
"I didn't think there was a big risk but there's always surprises with war. There could be very bad surprises. I mean wars are lost that should be won. Many wars are lost... You think a country is going to wipe somebody out and they end up getting wiped out themselves so it's always risky."

Complete imbecile.
How the feck can they claim to be so clueless on a war they've planned for 3 decades?
When they're running out of weapons?
And you people clutch to America's skirt?

Oh look everyone is getting in on the Chinese 'Don Tzu' Trump mockery

US is Running Out of Ammo Against Iran
http://youtu.be/0234zEi1AG4?si=K_K7tVJWeBM7nq5c

0:57 Chapter 1 'Just tell everyone you have tremendous amounts of ammunition' - Don Tzu

I bet there will be more in the video...

Hi Bezza,

"So you could say Trump is the latest of the Crusaders."

Trump Pentagon pick Pete Hegseth’s books foreground anti-Muslim rhetoric 28 November 2024
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/nov/28/pete-hegseth-trump-anti-muslim-book

>>In American Crusade, Hegseth presents the medieval crusades as a model for Christian-Muslim relations, but one historian of the period says his presentation of the history of that period is “just totally wrong”.

In a chapter entitled Make the Crusade Great Again, Hegseth writes: “By the eleventh century, Christianity in the Mediterranean region, including the holy sites in Jerusalem, was so besieged by Islam that Christians had a stark choice: to wage defensive war or continue to allow Islam’s expansion and face existential war at home in Europe,” adding: “The leftists of today would have argued for ‘diplomacy’ … We know how that would have turned out.”

Hegseth continues: “The pope, the Catholic Church, and European Christians chose to fight – and the crusades were born,” and “Pope Urban II urged the faithful to fight the Muslims with his famous battle cry on their lips: ‘Deus vult!,’ or ‘God wills it!’”

Hegseth has a tattoo of the same crusader slogan, which is also associated with Christian nationalism, white supremacist and other far-right tendencies.

For Hegseth, the crusaders’ short-lived victories in the Holy Land means they can be credited with safeguarding modern values. “Enjoy Western civilization? Freedom? Equal justice under the law? Thank a crusader,” having written the same thing again earlier in the chapter.<<

On an allied subject: the effort of Israel should not be forgotten.
It seems to have the idea that by decimating its neighbours, it will have peace for a thousand years.
The way I see human beings behaving, I doubt this will happen.
Instead, it will generate a long standing dislike and distrust of the regime.
Which in turn will lead to a continuing level of unrest.
Resulting in occasional outbreaks of hostility.
It seems that by trying to be an exclusive 'club', Israel is gradually painting itself in to a corner.

And I still think the US of A is losing its war in Iran.
Mr Trump will finish with egg on his face?
Though I doubt he will notice it.
But we certainly will.