The Forum > General Discussion > What if the Law Overules Science ? What are the Implications ?
What if the Law Overules Science ? What are the Implications ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Page 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
-
- All
Posted by Canem Malum, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 2:06:39 PM
| |
Canem Malum,
Yes, it's always the Jews and homosexuals, isn't it? It must all be part of the gay/Jewish media conspiracy! Sorry, but again, soy does not have a feminising effect: http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19524224 http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20378106 http://nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu/soy And, yes, it's the far-right and alt-right perpetuating this myth - as you are ironically demonstrating as we speak. Posted by John Daysh, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 2:43:19 PM
| |
The Hudson Institute of Medical Research has five specialist
centres which bring together the best professionals in Australian science and medicine to conduct basic and clinical research and provide hope for the wider community. The centres specialize in: innate immunity and infectious diseases, in cancer research, in reproductive health, in endocrinology and metabolism and the Ritchie Centre - in obstetrics and gynaecology and paediatrics. Our gender identity, the sense of whether one is male or female is one of the most sexually differentiated traits in humans. Growing evidence has led to a new conception of psychosexual development as a result of genetic, hormonal, and psychosocial influences. Future studies are needed to better clarify the complex inter-action between genes, anatomy, and hormonal influences on psychosexual development. __________________________________________________________________ Talking about Galileo? Galileo was put under house arrest by the Vatican for saying that the earth moved around the sun. In fact, in 1633 the church made him recant his theory of the universe. As we can see, while Galileo's and other wonderful discoveries were being made not much had been learnt by the political elite in 2000 years since Socrates' -murder by the state with CSIRO in 2006 being forbidden to publicly discuss the implications of climate change. New ideas, instead of being welcome as Prof. Hundloe said - were seen as threats to those who had become comfortable in their ideologies (religious or otherwise). For some - nothing changes. However, scientists will, and do, carry on regardless. Because that's what they do. And that is more important than all the naysayers put together. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 3:13:58 PM
| |
Cuts to CSIRO?
Really? Cuts to research into neuroscience, colorectal cancer, to water safety, advanced manufacturing, and much, much, more. Cuts would have a detrimental impact in so many areas. The public would not stand for it. Why would anyone suggest a cut in resources at a time like this? Cuts to our national broadcaster - the ABC? Also - really? Cuts to the delivery of original investigative journalism, local and regional news gathering and reporting, cuts would also pose a dangerous threat to the creation of original Australian TV productions, particularly drama. Again, the public would not stand for it. We need more innovation, greater choice in this country. The Murdoch Press controls enough as it is. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 3:42:22 PM
| |
Everyone, please refrain from referring to gender and/or sexuality as "identity".
Foxy, for example, just wrote: «Our gender identity, the sense of whether one is male or female is...» A sense is not an identity, and the sense of gender is no exception. We may be playing the social role of a male or a female, or we may wish to play some different such role in society - fair enough, that can be referred to as our "gender". But that gender of ours is not us, it is just something that some of us may have, and if we do then it is OUR gender: please refrain from speaking of it as "identity" because something we have can never be identical to us who have it! Posted by Yuyutsu, Tuesday, 3 September 2024 5:40:08 PM
| |
Our identities are made up of many parts.
Things like our culture, sexuality, religion, age, our body, gender, and lots more. Our identities are personal, no one can tell us how to identify. We are who we are. Regarding gender identity? Taken from the web: "Gender identity is your sense of whether you are a man, woman, nonbinary, gender fluid, or a combination of one or more of these identities. It's part of your sense of self. It's how you understand who you are and how you inter act with others." " For many people their understanding of who they are, their gender identity will match their sex. This is called being cisgender (pronounced - sis-gender). For some people, this gender identity might not match the sex they were assigned at birth and those individuals might choose to identify as transgender. For example being assigned female at birth but idendifying as a man." " It's important to remember that there is more to gender than just being "male" or "female." Some people understand their gender as being a combination of both, male or female, or neither. These people might choose identity as being gender diverse or non- binary. There are many words people choose to describe their gender identity." " The words people choose to describe their gender identity are very personal. Other ways of expressing gender identity refers to the way people publicly express their gender and may include how they behave, their appearance, what they choose to wear.." "Gender identity like sexuality is fluid. It can change with time. This is completely normal. You don't have to label your gender identity. However if you choose to label your sexuality or gender it's your choice. It's what feels best for you. And when you're ready - embrace and celebrate it." Posted by Foxy, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 10:11:07 AM
|
I don't see the Hudson institute as Independent as they have strong links with Monash University. I don't think I would see any western institution as independent at this point- especially when the Hudson institution is linked so closely with university institution- this is particularly starkly illustrated due to the disproportionately high "Voice Vote" in Canberra where the bureaucracy dominates the electorate in higher proportions to other territories.
Sadly universities are engines of indoctrination rather than Socrates vision of centres of thought. Teach before preach.
The way Foxy talks she doesn't seem to be very scientifically knowledgeable despite her claims of working for CSIRO. But I've been disappointed with the outputs of the CSIRO for a while. Perhaps the CSIRO needs to be defunded like the ABC.