The Forum > General Discussion > What if the Law Overules Science ? What are the Implications ?
What if the Law Overules Science ? What are the Implications ?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Page 22
- 23
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Yes, gender is a personal choice and I fully accept those people who say that their gender is different to their biological sex. No problem there.
Same for homosexuals and the whole spectrum, no problem at all.
We should indeed accept everyone, but should we accept their words too when they say nonsense?
- No, we are quite capable of accepting others without accepting all they say.
So suppose someone SAYS, "I am a cucumber" or "I am a broom", would you accept their words as correct just because they said so?
If someone says, "I am horse" and you observe, "No, you are not", and they reply, "Can't you see, I am a BROWN horse".
- Oh well, you have no problem with brown horses, but still they cannot be a brown horse because they are not a horse!
Same if someone says, "I am a gender" and you observe, "No, you are not", and they reply, "Can't you see, I am a TRANSGENDER gender".
- Sorry, you may fully accept their gender being transgender, but they are not a gender because nobody is a gender, neither those whose gender is male nor those whose gender is female, nor those who have no gender at all; and yes, nor those whose gender is transgender.
To identify with X means to say or think: "I am equal to X".
Well sorry, no one is equal to their gender (if they have one), whatever that gender may be.