The Forum > Article Comments > Lies as a pretext for war > Comments
Lies as a pretext for war : Comments
By Irfan Yusuf, published 29/6/2006How easy it is for lies and propaganda to be used as a pretext for war.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Page 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
- All
“My opinion: the invasion was intended to change the variables in the ME and place US troops near to Iran and Saudi Arabia - Saddam was foolish enough to give cause for concern. The US didnt think far enough ahead or take local and tribal loyalties into account (as usual) but I am not prepared to totally condemn the war –its one of those events that will take decades to analyse and it isn’t over yet.”
Decades to analyse – what on earth do you mean? I can point you to ample analysis if you like, and it was patently obvious to millions of people all over the world what was going on – they are after the oil.
All these comments reveal is that you are prepared to accept that the US was entitled to use ‘shock and awe’ violence, murdering thousands and destroying vital infrastructure in order to “change the variables in the ME and place US troops near to Iran and Saudi Arabia” – or to put it another way, get control of some of the biggest oil fields in the world.
You are therefore prepared to accept that the use of force to conquer another people, and further geostrategic hegemony in a region not your own, is legitimate.
So in other words, you do rationalize and justify violence on a mass scale, and the oppression of the Iraqi people. As I said, you are an apologist for the oppressor.
In these circumstances I fail to see how you can credibly condemn others for thinking that the use of violence is legitimate in furthering their aims – i.e. Islamic fundamentalists, Hitler etc. Unless, of course, you are a hypocrite. It is interesting that you are unwilling to accept violence committed against you, but are happy for it to be carried out against others in your name – until, of course, you take a few decades to analyse it.