The Forum > Article Comments > The awful funeral > Comments
The awful funeral : Comments
By Peter Sellick, published 14/3/2014We now attend funerals in which a number of speakers are let loose on the congregation tolling the virtues of the deceased, often blubbering into the microphone as they read scripts spat out by computer printers.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- ...
- 24
- 25
- 26
-
- All
Inherent,..in [FUN-ETHEREAL]..FUNERALS..you know the sign..by desIGN
http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-strange-fear-of-symbols.html
There are people who will argue that some symbols have “inherent meaning.” As if “the universe” sits around and writes down descriptions in a book, which is irrefutable.
Even if this were true, why do people have to accept those meanings?
Some symbols point to things that actually exist. Other symbols are fabricated with the intent of referring to fictions as if they were real. In both cases, the symbols are cooked and plumped up with meanings to impart a reaction.
I suppose God is the most widespread symbol on Earth. But instead of standing back and allowing the individual to decide what, if anything, it means to him, priest classes move in and organize religions to tell their stories, to embellish and codify the meaning of that symbol. And then to fight and kill to defend it.
Here is the symbol-maker’s proposition: “I’ll give you a symbol and tell you what it means and what it refers to. Then I want you to accept it, yes, but also to imbue it with feeling and awe and power. Give that power to the symbol. Make that investment. It’s your duty. Don’t vary or quibble.”
This is how humans are made into ciphers. This is mind control.
This post originally appeared at www.nomorefakenews.com