"...what should peace-loving forces in the world propose to do about their use against defenseless civilians ?"

Joe, surely you are not including the Yanks in the ranks of the 'peace-loving forces.' Since WW2, the Yanks have killed millions. Sure, they claim they are seeking peace while they wage endless war and profit from it.

How many more millions will they kill before the world wakes up and sees what they are engaged in: a quest for global domination!

from
http://henrymakow.com/2013/08/Psychopathology-of-Judaism.html

Judaism..is essentially..a political project.

Judaism..is not merely..a "religion,"..as many Jews are overt/atheists or..agnostics,..and they do not consider themselves..less Jewish for all that.

It is important.for Jews..to work toward
the emergence..of a world at "peace,"..[by their terms]

a peace..meant to be universal..and permanent...It is therefore..not a coincidence..that this word "peace"..*(shalom in Hebrew)
is found frequently..in Jewish discourse..worldwide.

In the perfect..[muchsmaller].l*world..
that they..are building,..All conflicts will disappear..*between the nations...

This is why Jews..have been militating..tirelessly..for many years for..the abolition of all borders,..the dissolution of national identities..and the establishment..of a global empire of "peace." T

The very existence..of separate nations..is considered to be responsible..for the triggering of wars and turmoil...so they must be weakened..and eventually replaced by..a world government.. a "one world government,"..a "New World Order,"

THE*one single..world-ruling authority..
that will permit*..happiness and prosperity to reign,..EVENTUALLY>>lol..under Jewish domination,.on earth... [Makow- Of course..they initiate..the wars..that serves as the rationale..for this one world government.]

The members..of the Jewish sect..are the most proselytizing/involved people..on earth,..but unlike Christians..or Muslims,..who dream of converting all peoples of all races..to their faith,

the Jews have no plan..to convert the world to..their own faith, Judaism, but simply..to encourage other nationalities..to give up their national and religious identities,,..and live only for the goal of "tolerance."

by their works..we see they fail

The unceasing campaigns..to blame all Whites for slavery,sexism/nationalism/diversion.division/ colonialism,..
the plundering of the Third World..or for Auschwitz..have no other purpose..than putting the opponent on the defensive,

and getting him
on his knees..not by violence..but via guilt.

When the Jews are the only people..left on earth
who are keeping their faith..and their traditions,..they will finally be recognized by everyone as God's "chosen people."
http://www.jewwatch.com/

Their "mission" (and Jews frequently use this term "mission")..is to disarm the other peoples,..to dissolve anything which is not Jewish or Jewish-controlled,..to grind the people down to a powder for making a new identity-free work force,[the perfect commie]..

capitalist gain
solialist bailout
]and thus to favor a universal "peace"..among the peoples
who have no more.."divisive"..free thinking identities.

Anyone who expresses an opinion on this while incurious over who made the gas attack is a poor excuse for a human being. Accepting without close, sceptical scrutiny the word of the USA - liars proven again and again and spectacularly demonstrated in 2003 - counts as incuriosity.

What would I advise the yanks to do, Loudmouth Joe? Stop saving everybody else's asses because they don't get much gratitude for their efforts.

The USA was Isolationist prior to WW1and WW2, and the Euros had to beg them to intervene and "kill millions" to get the Euros out of the poo. Today the Western Eurotrash can hardly say a good word about the Americans. Oddly enough, it the Poles, Latvians and Czechs think that their western cousins are stupid in their hatred of the USA. For forty years East European countries looked to the USA as their saviours from Soviet Communist tyranny. The Yanks saved Australia's ass in 1941 and today we have got intellectually challenged misfits on OLO who sit around dreaming up anti US conspiracy theories that are so wacky that they are more a help to people like me than their own side.

Trying to be neutral early this century got the yanks nothing because they were bombed into WW2 by the Japs. They now take a pro active stance to defence. Some moron on this thread claimed that the yanks wanted to get into the war. That's funny, the entire US army's inventory of tanks in 1940 consisted of two old WW1 French tanks. If they wanted to get in on the war, one might concluded that they would have been better prepared for it.

If you knew a bit of history you would know that the UN tried to get the yanks to "intervene" in Rwanda but the yanks would have none of it. The UN begged the yanks to go Somalia and protect the UN food convoys who were being extorded by the local warlords only to find that the people that they were helping to feed hated their guts. One US Colonel was famously quoted as saying "all we are doing is to feed them so they can fight us." Somalia must be full of David G clones and Loudmouth clones.

Rwanda. Ain't multiculturalism wonderful?

Joe,, using Japan is not a good example. It is true that the majority of Americans did not want to be involved in WW2. Roosevelt set out to change that. He instructed his staff to draw up a plan that would inevitably result in Japan attacking the US. That plan was drawn up and all eight points followed. Pearl Harbor was the result. Read Robert Stinnett's book, Day of Deceit for all the details.

At the end of the war Japan was suing for peace. The US refused to negotiate because they wanted to test their new nuclear weapons, one uranium and one plutonium. Civilian cities were chosen for maximum terror effect. Again the details are now well documented. People like Lego might prefer their fantasy history but the real world is rather different.

As others have already noted, the world's greatest purveyor of terror, responsible for more deaths than any other country post 1945, and more than willing to use chemical weapons, is the US. Read Scahill's Dirty Wars and Turse's Kill Anything That Moves (both 2013) for details on just some of these wars.

It's morning Lindsay Graham, a leading Senate hawk, said that the US has to bomb Syria to send a message to Iran. Try as one might, it is impossible to reconcile this with "punishing Syria" for alleged chemical weapons use, much less the other justifications that many of the commenters on this thread have advanced. Their stupidity, frankly, is matched only by the stupidity of the Americans themselves.

The following is a quote from former diplomate Bruce Haigh writing in this morning's Crikey. It contains more truth and common sense than most of what one reads on this subject:

"This is a unique opportunity for Australia to demonstrate some creative leadership of the UNSC. It is open to the new president to refer the issue of Syrian transgressions to the UN General Assembly, which would allow for free and open debate. Thus far there has been no mention from the US of seeking to work through the UN for a possible solution. Critics of the UN and those favouring a direct US attack are quick to cite the ineffectiveness of the UN, but undermining and bypassing the organisation creates self-fulfilling outcomes.

The power of dialogue, networking, influential connections and on-the-ground information-gathering has been subsumed by a belief that outcomes favouring the US can best be achieved by electronic surveillance and the use of force.

Obama’s 'solution' is bereft of imagination and subtlety. It is a frustrated, angry response from a tired and diminished superpower ...

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, likely to be prime minister after Saturday's election, said on the ABC's Insiders on Sunday and again on 7.30 last night that he did not favour an armed response along the lines being mooted by the US administration. After Saturday he might seek to give Quinlan the brief he needs to demonstrate Australian leadership and diplomatic mettle. Such leadership might help get America out of the bind it has created for itself and force a measure of respect for Australia hitherto lacking in the bilateral relationship.

Continued below