The Forum > General Discussion > Its not really flooding
Its not really flooding
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Page 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
>" He never claimed the dams would never fill again"
>That's true. Equally he never said they would fill again.
He may not have expressly said it, but he certainly implied it, including in the quote I paraphrased before (sorry, I still can’t find a link to the original yet) where he acknowledged the possibility of freak weather events (as I hope you agree the present situation is an example of) as well as the possibility that the modelling was wrong.
> And for years after those statements, others, both friend and foe, interpreted it to mean that he thought the dams
>and rivers would never fill. And nowhere, at no time, in those years, did Flannery step in to set the record straight.
Maybe a few people who just read the headlines and skip the detailed reports came to that conclusion, but how could he set the record straight when they wouldn’t read or watch what he said?
>He let the statement stand and only after it became utterly untenable did he then start putting out his defence.
The attacks came after the drought broke. Do you expect him to respond to them before they’re made?
>Even in the years when state governments around the country were spending (wasting really)
>billions on useless desal plants based partly on these false claims that the dams weren't gunna fill…
Tim Flannery said they might not fill before they ran dry. How utterly idiotic are the people who misinterpreted that claim as “they’ll definitely NEVER EVER fill"?
And considering what was at stake, and the fact that we didn’t know whether the dams would fill before they ran dry, it would have been stupid to fail to invest in desal. It’s far from useless, as we’ll have more long droughts in the future.