The Greens wouldn't allow the woman farmer to use her firearm to protect her life if she were attacked by a potential murderer/rapist, so the Greens value women less than chooks.
Paul1405,
That's a very valid question put to you by is Mise, any chance of you answering it ?

The gunnies and their crazy nonsense about "self defence", what does it entail, What the don't tell you.

If introduced it would apply to 100% of the population, after all every citizen could at some stage of their life require self defence. All that would be required would be a simple tick in the box to the question; Do you require a gun for self defence? YES! To be an effective self defence weapon the gun or guns (some gun slingers like to have more than one gun) would have to be loaded, and in your possession 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in the home, the car, the bus, at work, at the footy, at the kiddies park on weekends etc, you never know when a desperado is going to strike, must be prepared to open fire at all times! Some would prefer to carry an automatic weapon, others a concealed high powered pistol, the choice of firearm would be up to the individual. Guns would be sold to children, they also require self defence. gun would be given as birthday gifts to toddlers, old people, the insane (sorry, SSAA members already have them), there would be no restrictions. Guns would be sold in supermarkets, with such high demand for weapons and ammo, Coles and Woolies wouldn't want to miss out.

Of course we all know where this gun craziness will lead us, straight to Dodge City. The use of the weapon in self defence would be in the hands of the individual. Self defence could include, the noisy neighbour, the over charging check-out-chick, the annoying work colleague, the wife, etc. Not just koalas and wombats would be in danger as it is now, but all would be fair game if the gun crazy lunatics get their way!

Issy, please explain how YOU would have prevented John Edwards from murdering his two children with a gun?

BTW; How about naming and shaming the two fools who trained Edwards in the use of that gun. You are an insider with the SSAA, you should know.

Issy, please explain how YOU would have prevented John Edwards from murdering his two children with a gun?
Paul1405,
What a feeble-minded argument. Have no gun ? Use something else ? Those racist morons who run down people in cars didn't fire the cars out of a gun ! Bureaucracy ruins peoples' lives' without a gun ! By denying people the privilege of owning a firearm (just a basic .22 will suffice in most case) you're actually enabling the criminals by the knowledge that they're not going to take any risks !
I'm sure as you gradually grow out of adolescence you'll see things more clearly.

Paul,

The Greens wouldn't allow the woman farmer to use her firearm to protect her life if she were attacked by a potential murderer/rapist, so the Greens value women less than chooks.

I shewed you why, so tell us why the Greens would not allow the woman to defend herself.

Is it hatred of women?
Ideological correctness?
Plain stupidity?

Is it hatred of women?
Ideological correctness?
Plain stupidity?

Is Mise,
I like multiple choice questions & my answer is 'all of the above' !

Straight from the donkeys mouth;

Shooters and Hooters NSW policy under 'Firearms';

"Support family and home protection and continue to support measures increasing a person’s right to self-defence.... remove the recording of ammunition sales."

Issy is not my post above. //The gunnies and their crazy nonsense about "self defence", what does it entail, What the don't tell you.// The ramifications of S&H policy.

Did you not say you were one of the founding fathers of the Shooters and Hooters Party NSW?

When some 85 year old, old fart, shoots the 2 year old paperboy dead on the front lawn on a Sunday morning, I can hear the explanation now;

"Well Officer, I thought he was a burglar, I'll be more careful next time, I'll send some flowers to his funeral, that should square things up with the family."