Ise Mise again you make some weird claims
Please Supply links to prove your claims
Evidence too
Guns do not kill but in the hands of the wrong people mass murder is the result

Belly,

I assume that you are referring to my posts re the stupidity of the Greens NSW policy.

The references were given.

Learn to comprehend.

Paul,

" The fact is, you and those of your ilk would like to see 100% of the population, men women and children, armed at all times with no controls."

That's a wild assumption, when have I ever said that I'd like to see 100% armed?

"Just as the grubs from the SSAA gun club who trained John Edwards to kill his two children did not care about the consequences of their actions..".

That is plain libellous baloney, they did not train anyone to kill children, you have reached a new personal low with that remark.
Why do you continue to ignore the Police Commissioner issuing Edwards with a permit to possess a pistol, does it not fit the agenda?

Paul,

Robert Borsak, of the SF&F Party, is pursuing this matter of Edwards being given a Commissioner's Permit and the responsibility of the Commissioner and the Firearms Registry in the matter.

See, Legislative Council Notice Paper No 10, Thursday, 20 June 2019.

What are the Greens doing about the matter

Paul1405,
I'm still awaiting an explanation about the paper boys in your neighbourhood ! Or, are they just coming to your place at those hours ?

SR,

You spend so much time beside the point, I'm never really sure if you're aware of what the point is or just deliberately miss the point because you don't want it to be true.

In this case the point is that the shooters were taken out by people on the scene. Whether they were retired or off-duty police, servicemen or whatever is not the issue. The issue is that they were not the police.

Therefore the shooters were stopped by people other than the police and stopped by people with guns on the scene at the time. Therefore,( and I'm sorry to keep using the word therefore but I'm trying to lead you as simply as possible through the logic of the issue), therefore my original point, which you are trying so hard to avoid, remains correct..."That is, if you're unlucky enough to be involved in a mass shooting, you'd better hope that the citizens around you are armed because that's your best hope of survival."

mhaze,

"That is, if you're unlucky enough to be involved in a mass shooting, you'd better hope that the citizens around you are armed because that's your best hope of survival."

No one could have put it better.