The Forum > General Discussion > BUDJ BIM an Indigenous eel trap site added to World Heritage List!
BUDJ BIM an Indigenous eel trap site added to World Heritage List!
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 59
- 60
- 61
- Page 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- ...
- 89
- 90
- 91
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
It's called 'confirmation bias' - you put forward some crackpot theory and then search and search for anything which can be interpreted to, however vaguely, back up your theory. And, of course, deny, demonise and denigrate any counter-evidence.
In contrast, the scientific method tries to test theories for defects and weaknesses before tentatively and conditionally accepting them. Karl Popper goes further and suggests that first, one should try to strengthen somebody's theory; then, if it's crap, it will be crap at its STRONGEST point - every theory has weak points and it's no achievement to pull those apart. But a weak theory is weak at its strongest point.
In this case, what evidence is there that Aboriginal people farmed kangaroo grass or yam daisies, when there were hundreds of miles of them growing naturally ? Any fences, to protect valuable crops ? 'Valuable'- when the stuff grows wild (are we allowed to use that word ?) Any digging tools found by archaeologists, or collected by Foxy's 'authorities' ? Any evidence of storage, an essential for farming populations ? Any evidence of permanent farming villages, FARMING villages, like in New Zealand, not just central points for very productive foraging, i.e. hunting and collecting, such as river valleys, but farming ? Any evidence at all of actual farming, as conventionally defined ?
Please don't keep repeating the same old Google stuff, Foxy. We're getting to learn it off by heart and don't believe a word of it - without evidence.
Joe