The Forum > General Discussion > Beautiful Tears
Beautiful Tears
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Page 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
PALE, so choosing to move and taking the kids away from a parent who has been involved in their lives is in your view is fair?
PALE replies
Robert
For goodness sake get over it.
This may come as a big big surprise to you but people who are ALREADY seperated tend to move on with their lives.
In many cases they re marry and relocate for better oportunitys for familys future and work based reasons.
Most times[ Not always] it is the Mum who has the full time care and Dad visits to suite him.
Its looney to sugest a law be made that if a woman and Mother re marries she cant move into another area or state with her new husband without handing her kids over and giving them up to a Dad who probably works full time and cant keep them on his own anyway.
Also its a fact young children need Mum.
Control? I said you sound like you want to control everybody because you suggested a law be enforced that would be TOTALLY unfair.
Nobody should forget how important it is that marriages are taken seriously.
The best thing for kids is to know Dad loves us so much he travels @@@ to see us as much as possible.
Of course thats if the other parent has had to move for one of a million reasons!
Perhaps they moved to be closer toHIS children.
See what I mean Robert.
Second marriages have four others to consider- Not just ONE.
For example if your x wife re married and her husband was transfered inta state do you really think it would be fair to tell her she could not see her son?
What about her second husbands children- Should they not be entiled to see him too?
Your policy idea is really unworkable