Hi Foxy,

All the best with those ops, I know all will go well, and you will be on the mend in no time.

"The secret of health for both mind and body is not to mourn for the past, not to worry about the future, or not to anticipate troubles, but to live in the present moment wisely and earnestly."

Buddha

Best regards Paul.

Paul etc,

Well that's new. Normally when he's found to be in error or spinning a yarn out of whole clothe, he simply disappears so as to avoid having to admit error.

Now instead we have a tantrum. The man who created this whole thread out of unresearched assertions, decides that he who discovered that they were unresearched assertions is a liar. Wow!

" and get off your high horse"

Its not high...it just seems to be from your subterranean vantage.

The whole point of your thread was to assert that these people were hypocrites for going after boat people but not going after airplane people. Since we now know that this is utterly wrong, then the entire thread has been a futile endeavour.

Perhaps henceforth we should assume your assertions are wrong (especially if you say 'seems') and fact check them before proceeding.

It'd be nice if you accepted that you go it all wrong, just as it would have been nice if you admitted you got your assertions about the relative disparity between Green and Nat representations all wrong.

But, it SEEMS, that's a bridge too far.

80 posts so the thread got some interest
Rather more than some in fact
Unfortunately it could not avoid the personal attack and insults
But such is life here
Rather think Paul got it right, saw a few denying over stayers are a problem
Even challenged the numbers, far more than boat people ever reached
Dutton in the news with his war on truth attack on Shorten, claiming a briefing that he had to admit never took place
Maybe he should think about joining dads army after the loss of his seat

I note Foxy says that the use of the term hypocrite is the sign of a bully. I wonder what she thinks of Jesus Christ, who used the term frequently. The term refers to a person who says one thing to deceive others and in reality acts differently. Such a person is Al Gore who claims the planets warming will raise sea levels, but his house fronts the ocean.

Labor and Greens with the help of Green supporter Dr Phelps propose that two Doctors be given authority to have medical cases from Off shore detention be brought to Australia. This is the new channel to have illegal entry to Australia. Now all they need to do is injure themselves or swallow poisons or complain of supposed pain and the Dr's will assign them to Australia. Cheaper than paying people smugglers and risking drowning.

mhaze, can I expect that data any time soon?

There is no tantrum on my part. Seeing you have difficulty with the word data, you may need helping out with the meaning of tantrum.

TANTRUM; an uncontrolled outburst of anger and frustration, typically in a young child.

Telling one to get of their high horse, cannot be construed as an uncontrolled outburst of anger. Is English your second language? That would go a long way to explaining your language difficulties. Or maybe your lack of an education is a contributing factor. But chin up, keep at it, and you will get there one day.

Something else, from someone else.

"Like usual dear Paul can't discuss or deny the article so attacks the source of the article."

The article is gratuitous, what in the trade could be called a baseless column filler. On this occasion we have a double whammy, with one slimy foreign tabloid The Daily Mail, piggy backing on a local, equally slimy tabloid The Daily Telecrap. Both have a well earned, and well established reputation for dishonest journalism, producing sensationalised biased rubbish, even lies when it suits them to do so. Alarm bells ring whenever something written by one of their journalistic hacks is attributed to mystery sources, the insider, or the reliable source, unnamed, unknown, unfounded. The truth is the journalistic hack is simply making it all up. To give it some sort of credence he attributes it all to some unknown mystery informer.
Do I need to respond to this rubbish, NO! Does the Useful Idiot who posted it need to find the truthfulness of it, NO! The article must be true, because it only reinforces what he knows to be true anyway.

Paul1405 Liar Congratulations you managed to post a 161 word comment not one word of it used to refute the truthfulness of the article instead all you could attack was the origin of the article and the person who posted it.

That is an EPIC FAIL in anyone book.

Belly Quote "Rather think Paul got it right, saw a few denying over stayers are a problem
Even challenged the numbers, far more than boat people ever reached"

Your ability to brown nose is astounding.