Having said yesterday that the media rarely questions people's statements, I have to say that it did occur this morning, when an arrogant ABC reporter (Alison something) argued the toss with Senator Fraser Anning on News Radio. But of course, Anning is ‘extreme right, and Alison is a good little ABC Marxist.

When this harpy had finished her harangue against Anning, who she was supposed to be interviewing instead of touting her own Marxist views, she had a crack at his supposed waste of taxpayers money by appearing at a rally. Anning replied by pointing out that she and her employer waste $1 billion of taxpayers’ money each year.

Without commenting on Anning's politics - or rather his supposed politics - I have to give him full marks for the calm, polite way he dealt with the pig-ignorant ABC Marxist and her 'far right’ nonsense.

What about the obvious 'far Left’? They never get a mention. Is it because rude, aggressive behaviour, physical threats and filthy language is the norm for Australia's Left? Yes, it is.

ttbn,

No, rude, aggressive behaviour, physical threats, and
filthy language is not the "domain of the far Left."
It's the domain of people who consider that sort of
behaviour as normal. People who don't understand that
it is not OK to treat others like that.

That is precisely why we need our schools to model
respectful relationships that will help students to
understand that no one should be abused. And for
some students schools may provide the only safe
haven they have for coping with abuse. Going to school
for those students provides the stability and
support they require. That's why these programs have
been introduced in states and territories
throughout Australia along with the necessary tool kits
for teachers and principals to follow under the
guidance of the Departments of Education, Teachers
Associations, and Institutions of Learning

Dear Paul,

Tazi sounds like a remarkable young lady.
I hope she gets the party she wants.
I'm sure that she won't disappoint any
of you in her choices. By the sound
of it she's had a very strong foundation
in her upbringing - with lots of support
and love that have made her the admirable
person she is today - and that she will
continue to develop and be in the future.

My love to you, your family, and her.

The single biggest problem that most rational people have with the safe schools program is that it purported to be a program to promote tolerance and reduce the risk of bullying when in fact its objectives are completely different. Supposedly teaching children that gender is non binary and fluid and getting them to cross dress is going to engender tolerance?

The single biggest problem is that this concept has no scientific basis whatsoever and as Foxy alluded is an ideology that is closer to religion in its complete divorce from reality.

That only one person in 200 does not identify as the gender fixed by their chromosomes makes this toxic fantasy a pure indoctrination exercise.

Foxy, again you deflect.
The abhorrent behaviour you so quickly try to attribute to the right is thrown right back at you.
If you bothered to look at some of the rallies, nearly always it's the left who are what you describe.
If you applied the same critique as you did in describing the 'right', you will find, in reality, your first paragraph in response to ttbn is in fact a perfect description of your beloved left psychopaths.
If you ever watch TV or the news, of course you do, you know then the scenes where these lovely foul mouthed little wallflowers are yelling and screaming obscenities and using pepper spray or whatever devices gives them the physical advantage in any attempt to make their point, at the same time belittling any opposition.
Actually now that I think of it, I only have memories of the left and all their disgusting carry-on.
I think the right believe they do not need to waste their time as the majority are already on side.
This would make sense, because who needs to garner support for something that already has support.
But the other side shows it has little support, and that's why it is resorting to tactics too low to comprehend, and it is because of this display of such gutter tactics that people are removing their support for this less than human group or cult.
I have written, on another topic, how men have had enough of this petulant, childish carry on, and we have begun rectifying the situation, for the 'greater good'.
If the female smart arses of the world reckon they're as good as any man, let them prove it.
We won't allow these maggots to keep on infecting our children/us any longer.
If these females want to test our resolve let them.
I picture a scenario where these vermin are left lying in pain in their own wisdom to give serious thought to their acts and mantra.
They are not welcome and they are not right, so the sooner they are neutralised the better.
For ALL our sakes.

ALTRAV,

I did not as you claim, "try to attribute abhorrent
behaviour to the "Right." I stated that abhorrent behaviour
was "the domain of people who consider that sort of
behaviour as normal. People, who don't understand that
it is not OK to treat others like that. That no one
should be abused."

You have just proven my point with your last post.
You are a perfect example of rude, aggressive behaviour,
your posts are full of physical threats and filthy
language. And you think that this makes you a "real man".
There's no point in arguing with someone who does not
understand simple good manners and civility and who
thinks he is always right. Someone who has no self-respect
or respect for any one else.