The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Plain packaging....Labor boosts smoking rates!

Plain packaging....Labor boosts smoking rates!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. 14
  13. ...
  14. 22
  15. 23
  16. 24
  17. All
Ok, I think I'll leave OUG alone from now on. I suspect he's a sufferer of advanced Aspergers Syndrome, which is mild up to mid range autism. He can't be blamed for that. So I'll not be hard on him anymore.
Posted by Nhoj, Saturday, 7 June 2014 6:18:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Good to hear, nhoj.

I admit I'm prone to explode periodically to runner's gross insinuations, but there's nothing to be gained from baiting.

My son is diagnosed high-functioning ASD - fairly mild. He's a great young man - and a budding historian.
Posted by Poirot, Saturday, 7 June 2014 7:09:31 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
its ok//foxey..the old retarded john[backwords]
is typically walking backwards[backpeddling]..likE THEY ALLWAYS DO
http://rss.infowars.com/20140605_Thu_Alex.mp3

ANYHOW DEAR FOXIE..THAT SEARCH BACKWARDS JOHN MADE ME DO
TURNED UP A GEM..[SEEMS I MADE TAX ACCOUNTANT HISTERY]

anyhow poor boy..nojo..no go..poor poor boy
stuck his nose i the wrong hole...name calls and runs wee wee weeee..all the way down his leg..no proof poor aloof boy/girl\teenager[fairy queen?

ok dislexic john..nice bringing ya down to size
how tall you are//one never knew poop could be staKKED THAT HEIGHT

YOUR WRAPPER CLEARLY IS A SLIGHTER SHADE Of tab
the wurdy/nurdy..wurd-ho's proofs let him dowm..MOUTHed reproofs.. TOO BIG FOR HIS..tiny-biased..MIND

WINDS ONE UP/THEN RUINS AWAY AS IT ALL UNRAVELES[UNWINDS]/WE HAvE A WHINer/minor whiner.light weight/even his brain farts dont make the starter weight.

weal as urine
as yellow as toilet snow..that scummy stuff..or bravado..on the run*

see ya backwards j0hn..time to move on
[he must have read the 9 th search return.]

poor boy..out of his depth..king
of the mountain fell down/flat on his own lack/of\fact..
its a disgrace..the coward..a wurdY Opinionated..troll-HAwker..of loose bias..read lies..the witless one runs hides avoids..and cries.

one/under]sighs..
Posted by one under god, Saturday, 7 June 2014 8:33:44 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
As I have said on this discussion site "Is someone willing to give cigarettes the butt?" - after when about five years my father (who was a smoker) started to have a heart attack whilst driving and later collapsed in a GP clinic - and has since given up smoking all together.

I had tried to get him and my mother to give up since I was about eight years of age. Too many people have seen these graphic images too much who are smokers and are now simply used to them - but to link it to increases in smoking is purely unintelligent.

I stand by my comments that cigarettes should be phased out in Australia and I am waiting for OUG to tell me: "that the case against smoking based on bogus statistics and downright lies." Direct quote.

Sorry but doesn't this discussion prove that more needs to be done to get people away from smoking and strong action is the only way to go?
Posted by NathanJ, Saturday, 7 June 2014 10:57:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Nathan, I feel the current anti smoking methods are working, and will continue to work. If cigarettes are "phased out" that effectively means banning/prohibition. Prohibition NEVER works regarding recreational drugs. It just creates a bigger black market ... just look at the alcohol prohibition in the USA in the 1920s, it was a DISMAL failure.

Currently cigarette smoking has been demonised and discredited, and this has worked quite well. If people feel ashamed to smoke, then they are FAR less likely to smoke.

The 2 most harmful drugs known to society are alcohol and tobacco. If alcohol was also demonised and discredited in the same way that tobacco is, alcohol abuse would be far less. It would be tougher to achieve though, because of the EXTREME power of the alcohol industry, but it IS achievable.

Banning recreational drugs like alcohol and tobacco is not the way to go. The way to go is a combination of factual education regarding harmful affects and social demonisation and discrediting of the drugs.
Posted by Nhoj, Saturday, 7 June 2014 11:18:22 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Foxy, thanks for your kind words to OUG, but anyone who swears at me like that has lost any respect I ever had.
Obviously, using language like that is ok on this forum?

He needs far more help than any of us can give.
I give up anyway and will not respond to any posts from him again.
See you all on another thread...
Posted by Suseonline, Sunday, 8 June 2014 1:57:56 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. 14
  13. ...
  14. 22
  15. 23
  16. 24
  17. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy