The Forum > General Discussion > how to suceed succesion ..?..[lamb-island]
how to suceed succesion ..?..[lamb-island]
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- ...
- 49
- 50
- 51
-
- All
Posted by one under god, Friday, 4 October 2013 8:45:02 AM
| |
Good point, WmTrevor.
>>Given that Bristols is a rhyming slang term... does that make Bristol Pounds a décolletage weight measure?<< I believe they actually use the term today, to limit the amount of local currency permissible in any single transaction. As in, "anything more than a handful of Bristols is a waste" Posted by Pericles, Friday, 4 October 2013 8:51:19 AM
| |
im..holding back..to just watch
but noted the front page,..of the redlands times..confirms much..of what we already know.. but gives a sniff..of they know what they are doing eg..a qld constitution lawyer..dropped this clever bit which is..true..cause i heard the same point re uncle kevin..appeal to the high court[cause i heard the judge say it] he said in affect..'why do..you come to me by your own claim..i have no..right..[lawful authority] but as usual..the actual..quote is noted..here nicolas said..<<that ..claims..to the high court have been rejected..as being,,inconsistant..with the request being made'' <<..if your going..to..the high-court..for a 'determination' you are recognizing..the high court>>.. [thus a part of the jurisdiction.. over which..it can lord it/rule].. <<..then..you are by your own..act.. choosing..to/be part..of..the state.. by which..the high court..claims egzistant/active authority..over you you are..in affect.. RECOGNIZING..the right of the courts..jurisdiction you submitted..your standing giving the court..you begged..to claim..higher standing..OVER YOU they will try to do it by various means like saying..change of boundary...only by commonwealth or even implied consent..[the superior asks..the submissive replies] masters question..the lessor begs apply means beg..you got what you begged for..[app-lied] what is implied or what is applied..for in the constitution..by whom? Posted by one under god, Friday, 4 October 2013 11:25:08 AM
| |
how great..is the usa
it was able..to issue its own..money but it gave up that right to bankers..so they can create money http://whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/thequestion.jpg thing is today,,money..isnt money[see old money was a bond a bound promise to..DELIVER..gold silver or copper..in *weights..of pounds/dollars pennies..or shilling WEIGHTS* thus..the earlier mention..of pounds <<..does that make..Bristol Pounds..a décolletage weight measure?>> i will need google that and..it still..dont make a low-cut http://www.google.com.au/search?q=a+décolletage+weight+measure%3F thanks to pericules..i may figure it out <<..I believe..they actually use..the term today, to limit..the amount of local currency..permissible in any single transaction.>> i hate it when..they..chance words meanings but have faith..thats what it now means..to lower..[go beyond]..the limit <<..As in,.."anything more than a handful..of Bristols is a waste">> great..im into waste but handfuls or not..a bristol..pays the rates but i would yet again..point out the wikiseed..pays off all govt debts govt confirmed..that right by the mass privatizations..of govt agencies,assets..,following our notice to govt of it..from 1996..and confirmation..of it in 200o] but till people test it.. by drawing on my underwriting..of the wiki seed delivery..why bother but i see that the island...could get power supply..by tender collectively insure the whole island[shared discounts..reduced rates..[eg..i do DRY-rubbish removal.for free][on the condition..its kept clean dry unbroken..minimum damage etc..ie remains a cleanproduct [with all wet dirty stuff into the sewer to recover methane thing is to retain..the value of the imported assets values to maximize any possible return[ie bottles can be refilled..labels make collage but why bother its easier to think me insane push me to present..my proofs.,.or explain..more clearly..particular points..mean while the lost harvest..[seized by govt long ago]..multiplies steadily.. 10 fold each passing year going back..over 40 years the seed..is like the old promise to pay..in gold/silver/copper] [except with us..its living seed[or food]..or for value[exchange/medium [see rev 22;2..for the healing* Posted by one under god, Friday, 4 October 2013 12:08:16 PM
| |
Belly, it doesn't need "government approval". That's the whole point about secession.
The United Nations recognises the "right of all peoples to self-determination", and Australia also recognises it. For example, that was the basis of Australia's involvement in East Timor. Australia supported East Timor seceding from Indonesia, even though East Timor didn't have "government approval". Same with Kosovo I think it was. Neither Hutt River nor Snake Hill Principality required or got "government approval". If government approval was a requirement, the USA would not be an independent state, neither would Ireland, most of the states of South America, and many other states of the world. Posted by Jardine K. Jardine, Friday, 4 October 2013 12:10:39 PM
| |
JKJ you amaze me!
Do you honestly hold the view a chance, any chance, exists this place can circumvent the Federal Government and be a free nation? Are you aware of the Hut Provence? A so called free nation within ours? While an interesting subject but, if you truly hold that thought I remind you every house in Australia could do it too. Do we understand the tax position alone, every tax avoider in the world could live there. Posted by Belly, Friday, 4 October 2013 2:51:28 PM
|
since long before in/usa..or france
''we the people''..decided to form..a lasting union
of..rightful/useful occupation..and mutual obligation..to serve..the protections of..all the people....
and the PEOPLES culture..achievements..history/standing and estates..[and natures creations]
<<Even..the official/states aren't allowed
("one indissoluble/Federal Commonwealth").>>
yes the slave master..learns might is right
but the alternative..is that the federal constitution
[ratified a..British Parliament act..is at best a colony
[those...so called 'state'..each have a gg..[meaning they are ipso-facto colonies
regardless the federal-con..allows
the formation..of more 'states'..i suggest we would be better srerved with..520 much smaller [town size states..that the few state AND terror-Torrie..we now got
[are we..not all equal?..the federal rules state..
that where..state law..is divergent..the fall..under federal law
your missing that we all got birth rights
so your hope/fear..decieves you..<<I hope..they realize>>
that in..your OPINION..<<..they will have no claim..on anything funded by the Australian..or Queensland governments..for our citizens (defence, Medicare, Centrelink, disaster relief, legal aid).>>
great i will inform..png..and other places
australia dont care..[we already know..that..
thats why..i presume..they are talking of succeeding
<<..Needing a passport>>
no..merely a visa stamp
*our own govt..provides..passport
[but ya ever..heard of duel-passport holders?
<<..and alternate currency>>
via a cyber smart card?..or in coin?
or in collectible fiat bank notes[that have a promise topay..in-full[in seed]..by me?[see wikiseed/wikigeld]
<<..may in..fact kill..any tourism/they..currently have..>
what tourism..[redlands has..so many hidden gems..[but the local council..is about developing/nest feathering..not for either its people not tourists
why?..<<There are..easier destinations.>>
yes same same..[how lame]..we got natures.fun parks
we got ..wildlife[running free]....not zoos..
we got..a living..nurturing culture..we want..to use what we got
<<There are less..than 500 residents>>
a perfect trial size
[can i..be the rubbish guy?
i got some..good ideas..for that,
<<..only a third/working full time.>>
full time work is falling..everywhere
clearly..your implication is two/thirds are dole blunderers
but most there..are retired..[on-pensions]..[do pensions..get paid..to europe/britan/nz etc..
but..its all good
you seem handy..with numbers
how much full time..do you aussies work?
<<Good luck,
kids>>
i..hesitate to say..their average age
exceeds..your present r-age.