The Forum > General Discussion > Fertility rate of 1.8 and we are still murdering our own unborn babies?
Fertility rate of 1.8 and we are still murdering our own unborn babies?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Page 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- ...
- 26
- 27
- 28
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Do you dispute the changes in common law interpretations of the Crimes Act or Criminal Code? It is a very different environment to (say) 20+ years ago when you could have been raising children.
However I am sure you are missing my point because I am not challenging what has changed and nor am I talking solely about late term. Although feminist Leslie Cannold an 'ethicist' (is there such an occupation?) who was to be a running partner with Assange believes in abortion up to the moment of birth with no limitations - healthy, normal infants. Even that is not what I am wanting to address ATM.
What I am concerned about is that the unforseen negative consequences of economic and social policy might be higher abortion numbers among couples who want children. There are government reports stating that young couples who want children are having to put them off because they cannot afford them. As well, they are not having the number of children they want. Could it be that poor Government planning is contributing to that sad state of affairs where it is likely that wanted children are being aborted? Secondly, there is oddly a dearth of data on abortions, why so?
I am not pointing the finger at one political party. Just asking why women at their best childbearing age are being forced by financial circumstances to abort.
Why is it so do you reckon?