The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > The Boston Bombing & the Second Amendment (Guns) - Is there any relationship ?

The Boston Bombing & the Second Amendment (Guns) - Is there any relationship ?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. ...
  11. 14
  12. 15
  13. 16
  14. All
the more we tolerate abnormality the more we must accept it. There is an alternative but most people don't like discipline especially those who think they know better.
Posted by individual, Thursday, 18 April 2013 6:39:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The media always make so worthwhile to people who commit terrorism. The terrorist act is the gold standard way of getting huge publicity, including photos and footage of the dreadful consequences at a personal level.

There is a difference between reporting and making a sensationalist production and series out of it.

How could the media be responsible citizens and not give the offenders and would-be offenders the sensationalist publicity they seek?
Posted by onthebeach, Thursday, 18 April 2013 7:02:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
O Sung,
I'm surprised you'd be a fan of Michael Savage, he's not known as a respected source of good information, he'd be on a par with Alex Jones in my opinion. ie take his words with a grain of salt.
Savage always tries to connect everything into some anti White/Anti Patriot/ anti first and second amendment conspiracy but ask yourself, why would someone who is not White himself be so concerned about making these links? All he's doing is spreading disinformation, perpetuating these false links between terrorism, which for the most part has clearly defined objectives and constitutionalism or patriot causes via the medium of this nonsensical "False Flag" trope.
Who do we trust, well nobody, but whose views fit the world as we, normal, rational men know it?
Ryan Dawson is as decent a commentator as you will probably get, but, again portions of what he says are merely plausible, but not probable the stuff about Israel and 9-11 for example:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Rys2sense
Davis Aurini, is reasonable, his arguments make sense, but again, as a rational man you have to see if they fit with your understanding of the way the world works:
http://www.youtube.com/user/Aurini/featured
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 18 April 2013 8:14:28 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Alex Jones has just released real evidence that something is wrong about the official story.They were conducting an simulated attack at the very time the real bombs went off.Bomb sniffer dogs were there and navy seal people were wearing back packs.People were been told that this was only exercise and not to panic.

The official story that a suspect had been found was canned when Alex Jones released this evidence. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player-embedded&v=axQtAFtmtVA#!

Alex Jones has declared that this is his biggest bust in 18 yrs.
Posted by Arjay, Thursday, 18 April 2013 10:26:40 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
'evening folks...

Hi ONTHEBEACH...

With respect, there IS a 'trail' for an auditor to follow. When one attempts access to a particular Site, your ID Number, Rank and Name are entered, and depending on your 'need to know' clearance, access may be granted provided your Password is on the list of police who are 'allowed access'.

Be assured, there are a number of heavily protected Sites, that access thereto is heavily restricted, far more then the general public are aware, and are not part of public access, in terms of FOI ?

Your illustration of a terminal located on the charge counter being easily seen by the public - well, I don't know why that occurred ? Other than total lack of professionalism by the member operating that terminal ? As a sergeant, I'd kick his arse till his nose bled, if I was OIC of the shift ! That terminal from memory (it may have changed ?) would furnish access to very basic data available to police, and nothing that rated special access, that many of the detectives would have a need to know.

Mate, we're all human. Even us dumb coppers. Most take the job seriously, some don't. Those who don't, are simply slugs n' dogs. Much of the data contained in the police network, is for the protection and safety of police. So he/she can return home in one piece at the end of his/her shift. These 'Joe cool' coppers who are straight out slack, rendering their colleagues at considerable risk, would be harshly dealt with when detected, and detected they are, in the fullness of time.

Actually BELLY old friend I was referring more to the remarks/statement of Dr Savage, challenging the government to (try) take his firearms. You're right, they do seem to value their right to a firearm, more highly than anyone else from a comparable demographic ? I for one will never truly understand, their need of that all important 2nd Amendment right ? The paramount safety of a child, is far more important than my right to a F/A.
Posted by o sung wu, Thursday, 18 April 2013 10:39:27 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Arjay,
Those guys with the backpacks have Cop written all over them but "false flag" attacks just don't happen, the most credible theories are:
Islamic extremist (probable).
FBI or BATF sting operation gone wrong (plausible).
Lone nut (probable).
If Sandy Hook didn't convince the politicians to clamp down on second amendment rights how would an unclaimed bombing in Boston, of all places do a better job?
All of this "false flag" malarkey fails the reason test, "does this fit with the world as we know it?".
Tyrants don't mess about, they round up people they don't like and kill them or throw them in jail, the fighters who oppose them attack without mercy but they make it known to all why they are killing people and blowing things up. The 1970's were the heyday of terrorism in the West, all of these events including 9-11 fit that pattern, false flags and an American government intent on liquidating it's domestic critics doesn't.
Posted by Jay Of Melbourne, Thursday, 18 April 2013 10:57:00 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. Page 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. ...
  11. 14
  12. 15
  13. 16
  14. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy